Epstein Secrets

gh Denies Application From Illinois GOP Contesting Ban On Sizable Political Gatherings. The Hill (7/4, Moreno, 2.98M) reports Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh "rejected an application on Saturday from the Illinois Republican Party challenging Democratic Gov. J.B. Pritzker's executive order banning large p

strations." The Hill adds, "On Friday, the party sought an emergency injunction against the governor's restrictions." The application was denied by Kavanaugh without comment. Coronavirus Impacting West Texas, Where Some Have No Trust In Government. The New York Times (7/4, Goodman, 18.61M) says that it a

oln." The President on Saturday also tweeted, "'Change Hearts Not Stones. There is no end to historical purification.' Great historian Doug Wead." Scalia Says "It Would Mean A Lot" To Have His Father In Trump's Proposed Hero Garden. The New York Post (7/5, Moore, 4.57M) reports that Labor Secretary Sc

amuel A. Alito Jr., Neil M. Gorsuch and Brett M. Kavanaugh." According to Reuters (7/14, Allen, Lynch), "Ju

or is unclear, the opinion was the work of Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel A. Alito Jr., Neil M. Gorsuch and Brett M. Kavanaugh." According to Reuters (7/14, Allen, Lynch), "Just 10 minutes passed between" the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals "revoking the last outstanding in

in public, staying six feet apart, and protecting the vulnerable to slow the spread, we can actually have some degree of normalcy." Labor Secretary Scalia said on WTN-FMVi Nashville, TN (7/14, 8K), "I don't think we reopened too fast. I think, though, that there are some people who reopened irresponsib

pret and follow the law regardless of the outcome. Id. (citing? Bostock v. Clayton County, — U.S. -, 140 S. Ct 1731, 1823, 207 L.Ed.2d 218 (2020) (Kavanaugh, J., dissenting)). WESTLAW @ 2021 Thomson Reuters. No claim to original U.S. Government Works. 19 EFTA00074617 In re Wild, 994 F.3d 1244 (2021)

nion is like a pirate ship. It sails under a textualist flag, but what it actually represents is a theory of statutory interpretation that Justice Scalia excoriated ...."). The dissents commit a basic error of statutory interpretation by reading subsections (a)(5), (aX8), and (dX3) in isolation with