Epstein Secrets

bring the resident defendant into state court." Crowe' Coleman, 113 F.3d 1536, 1538 (11th Cir. 1989) (

. Such a remand is the necessary corollary of a federal district court's diversity jurisdiction, which requires complete diversity of citizenship." Henderson'. Washington Nat. Ins. Co., 454 F.3d 1278, 1281 (11th Cir. 2006). Federal Courts are obligated to construe removal statutes very strictly, and "all

t 10/031, . J8 Page 5 of 8 108-09 (1941). Thus, when the Court's jurisdiction over a case is doubtful, doubts arc resolved in favor of remand. See Crowe . Coleman, 113 F.3d 1536, 1539 (11th Cir. 1997). Discussion Fraudulent Joinder A defendant's statutory "right of removal cannot be defeated by a f

. Such a remand is the necessary corollary of a federal district court's diversity jurisdiction, which requires complete diversity of citizenship." Henderson'. Washington Nat. Ins. Co., 454 F.3d 1278, 1281 (1Ith Cir. 2006). Federal Courts are obligated to construe removal statutes very strictly, and "all

rg Constangy Brooks Cox Castle Cozen O'Connor Crowe & Dunlevy Crowell & Moring Crowley Fleck Culle

orter Wright Post & Schell Poyner Spruill Procopio Cory Proskauer Rose Pryor Cashman Quarles & Brady Quinn Emanuel Quintairos Prieto Rawle & Henderson Reed Smith Reinhart Boerner Richards Layton EFTA00032323 --- PAGE BREAK --- Riker Danzig Rivkin Radler Robbins Geller Robins Kaplan Robins