Epstein Secrets

licated." See generally, Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland v. Superior Court, 28 Cal.Rptr.3d 355, at 360, c

of the claim." As stated by the Supreme Court in Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-323, 106 S.Ct. 254

of the statute is to impose punishment that is criminal in nature, the ex post facto clause is implicated." See generally, Roman Catholic Bishop of Oakland v. Superior Court, 28 Cal.Rptr.3d 355, at 360, citing Kansas v. Hendricks, 521 U.S. 346, 360.61 (1997). The effect of applying the 2006 version of

ief is sought may move, with or without supporting affidavits, for summary judgment on all or part of the claim." As stated by the Supreme Court in Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322- 323, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 2552 (1986) ... summary judgment is proper "if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interroga

. C 03-04035 CRB. Feb. 13, 2006. David Replogle, Law Offices of David Replogle, PC, San Francisco, CA, John E. Hill, Law Offices of John E. Hill, Oakland, CA, for Plaintiffs. Nanci Lynne Clarence, Kate Dyer, Clarence & Dyer LLP, Jan Nielsen Little, Keker & Van Nest, LLP, San Francisco, CA, William S

en of proof, simply point out to the Court that "the nonmoving party has failed to make a sufficient showing of an essential element of her case." Celotex Corp. v. Cat rett, 477 U.S. 317, 323, 106 S.Ct. 2548, 91 L.Ed2d 265 (1986). All doubts as to the existence of a genu- ine issue of material fact must be