Epstein Secrets

er, the trial court refused to evaluate these issues, choosing instead to exclude 'In a May 7, 2012, Order, a predecessor trial judge, the Honorable David Crow, found the privilege log to be insufficient on its face and not in compliance with the requirements of Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.280(v)(5) and Tigg Ins. Co

owell & Associates 644 Cesery Blvd., #250 Jacksonville, FL 32211 [email protected] [email protected] Co-Counsel for Intervenors E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe Co-Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter- Defendant Jeffrey Epstein VIA U.S. MAIL Paul G. Cassell S.J. Quinney College of Law at the University of Utah

ncealed their existence by hiding them within a deceptively worded I ,607-entry, 159-page privilege log that this Court's predecessor, The Honorable David Crow, found to be insufficient on its face and not-compliant with the requirements of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(b)(5)7 and TIG Ins. Corp. v.

in reliance on Edwards' previous waiver and agreement to produce the same, these e-mails must be deemed not protected by Edwards' clear waiver. See Jane Doe No. I v. United States, 749 F.3d 999 (11th Cir. 2014)(held that Epstein's former counsel had waived the work-product privilege with respect to docum

wsuit last month against Epstein on behalf of victim M.J., asking for $50 million in damages. At a court hearing Friday, Scarola told Circuit Judge David Crow that all lawsuits were settled for "very substantial sums of money, which is directly contrary to the assertions that Mr. Epstein made that these c

timidate him so as to abandon the justified prosecution of his claims against Mr. Epstein," Scarola said. Edwards secured deals for victims N, and Jane Doe, who were among nearly two dozen young women who received confidential settlements from Epstein. Edwards filed a new lawsuit last month against Eps