Epstein Secrets

COURT: Let me slow down a little bit. On behalf of The Post is? MS. SHULLMAN: Deanna Shulman. THE COURT: S-H-U-L — MS. SHULLMAN: THE COURT: Ms. Shullman, good morning. Mr. Berger, good morning, And Mr. Barr, your client is E — MR. BERGER: E.W.. yes. THE COURT: Anybody else has? MR. EDWARDS: Brad Ed

Berger, good morning, And Mr. Barr, your client is E — MR. BERGER: E.W.. yes. THE COURT: Anybody else has? MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards on behalf of E.W. as well, Judge. Thanks. Page 5 1 NI grant that request. If they're not entitled to seal 2 then I'll order it as documents unsealed. But that's

COURT: Let me slow down a little bit. On behalf of The Post is? MS. SHULLMAN: Deanna Shulman. THE COURT: S-H-U-L — MS. SHULLMAN: THE COURT: Ms. Shullman, good morning. Mr. Berger, good morning, And Mr. Barr, your client is E — MR. BERGER: E.W.. yes. THE COURT: Anybody else has? MR. EDWARDS: Brad Ed

Berger, good morning, And Mr. Barr, your client is E — MR. BERGER: E.W.. yes. THE COURT: Anybody else has? MR. EDWARDS: Brad Edwards on behalf of E.W. as well, Judge. Thanks. Page 5 1 NI grant that request. If they're not entitled to seal 2 then I'll order it as documents unsealed. But that's

. "The frustration is we have no idea why these records were sealed because it seems to have been sealed by a simple agreement of the parties: said Shullman. Circuit Judge Jeffrey Colbath seemed inclined to agree the deal should never have been sealed in the first place. but gave Epstein's lawyers until

th to do so today. "It is against public policy for these documents to have been sealed and hidden from public scrutiny. As a member of the public, E.W. has the right to have these documents unsealed," wrote former Circuit Judge Bill Berger, now in private practice and representing one of the women.

d on these matters on June 25, 2009. The Court notes that Mr. Goldberger, Esq. and Mr. Critton, Esq. were present on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. Ms. Shullman, Esq. was present on behalf of the Palm Beach Post, Mr. Berger, Esq. and Mr. Edwards, Esq. were present on behalf of E.W., Mr. Kuvin, Esq. was prese

Jeffrey Epstein. Ms. Shullman, Esq. was present on behalf of the Palm Beach Post, Mr. Berger, Esq. and Mr. Edwards, Esq. were present on behalf of E.W., Mr. Kuvin, Esq. was present on behalf of B.B., Assistant State Attorney Barbara Bums was present on behalf of the State of Florida. No appearance

d on these matters on June 25, 2009. The Court notes that Mr. Goldberger, Esq. and Mr. Critton, Esq. were present on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. Ms. Shullman, Esq. was present on behalf of the Palm Beach Post, Mr. Berger, Esq. and Mr. Edwards, Esq. were present on behalf of E.W., Mr. Kuvin, Esq. was prese

Jeffrey Epstein. Ms. Shullman, Esq. was present on behalf of the Palm Beach Post, Mr. Berger, Esq. and Mr. Edwards, Esq. were present on behalf of E.W., Mr. Kuvin, Esq. was present on behalf of B.B., Assistant State Attorney Barbara Burns was present on behalf of the State of Florida. No appearance

d on these matters on June 25, 2009. The Court notes that Mr. Goldberger, Esq. and Mr. Critton, Esq. were present on behalf of Jeffrey Epstein. Ms. Shullman, Esq. was present on behalf of the Palm Beach Post, Mr. Berger, Esq. and Mr. Edwards, Esq. were present on behalf of M., Mr. Kuvin, Esq. was present

quy, they were an inducement for defendant to enter into his guilty pleas. They are proper objects of discovery. However, unless they are unsealed, E.W. is unable to obtain them or utilize them in her case. 7. Pursuant to Rule 2.420(dX5), the Court must hold a hearing on this motion in open court.

w down a little bit. On behalf of The Post is? MS. SHULLMAN: Deanna Shullman. THE COURT: S-H-V-L -- MS. SHULLMAN: S-H-U-L-L-K-A-N. THE COURT: Ms. Shullman, good morning. Mr. Borger, gOOd morning. And Hr. Berger, your client is E -- HR. BERGER: E.W., yes. THE COURT: Anybody else here? MR. EDWARDS: Bra

ATE OF FLORIDA, E.W., THE PALM BEACH POST, B.B, Respondents. E.W.'S SEALED REQUEST TO DISMISS THE PETITION FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION Respondent, E.W., would show the Court as follows: 1. This Court lacks jurisdiction to hear this petition. The order under review is a non-final order for which no

, now in ptivateptactice-ahd representing one ofthe women. The Pilrn Beach Post also will ask Colbath to unseal the agreement. Post attorneyDeanha,Shullman:will atgue,that the,public has aright to know the specifics ofEpsteii;i'.s cleat: According' to ya,rious media accoµnts, Epstein moved in cirdes t

h to do so today. "It.is against public policy for these documents to be have been sealed and hidden from public scrutiny. As a member of the public, E.W. has a right to have these documents unsealed," wrote former CircuitJudge Bill Berger, now in private practice-and representing one ofthe women. The P