Epstein Secrets

t "A" at pp. 169-171, 185-186. Edwards counsel made clear that Edwards would not answer "any questions" related to the alleged investigation done by Fisten and other investigators. Therefore, it was clear that despite the fact that Mr. Edwards and Mr. Fisten discussed Epstein and the Jane Doe matters w

stein v. Epstein, 519 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). The financial information sought here is clearly relevant. (b) Topic Specific Objections As to Michael Fisten Should Be Overruled and Edwards Should be Compelled To Return For Deposition to Testify to Same and to His Newly Filed Affidavit 6. Michael Fiste

foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this day of , 2010: MARC S. NURIK, ESQ. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Gary M. Farmer, Jr., Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews

t "A" at pp. 169-171, 185-186. Edwards counsel made clear that Edwards would not answer "any questions" related to the alleged investigation done by Fisten and other investigators. Therefore, it was clear that despite the fact that Mr. Edwards and Mr. Fisten discussed Epstein and the Jane Doe matters w

stein v. Epstein, 519 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). The financial information sought here is clearly relevant. (b) Topic Specific Objections As to Michael Fisten Should Be Overruled and Edwards Should be Compelled To Return For Deposition to Testify to Same and to His Newly Filed Affidavit 6. Michael Fiste

foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this day of , 2010: MARC S. NURIK, ESQ. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Gary M. Farmer, Jr., Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews

ndlbe y)OTHSTEIN and others offered other investors like the entity D3 fabricated investment opportunities in the Civil Actions involving EPSTEIN. Fisten (a former Dade County police officer with a questionable police record and RRA investigator nne (a former attorney, Broward County Sheriff and felo

nt naming additional Defendants was filed. 21. In addition, and upon information and belief, ROTHSTEIN, David an, ebbie Villegas, Andrew Barnett, Michael Fisten and Kenneth Jenne (all employees of RRA) through brokers or middlemen would stage regular meetings during which false statements were made about th

S OF NE COR OF LOT 2 ON E/L, W 20.52 ALG F ST RD 84, S 15.72 TO POB, S ov S 7.25, E 12.59, S 24.40, W 29.9 AKA: BAY 1 PORTS1DE l ir (RPI3) 1012 East Broward B ard, as "Defendant and easeme 6 31.74, N 24.00, E 49.07 TO FOB umber of 5042 23 28 0010; rt Lauderdale, Florida, hereafter also referred to

ase No. 09-CV-81092. 23. Admit that Ken Jenne was involved in the decision to file the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09-CV-81092. 24. Admit that Michael Fisten was involved in the decision to file the Complaint (DE #1) in Case No. 09-CV-81092. 25. Admit that in paragraph 9 of the Complaint (DE #1) in Case

West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5012 Fax: 561-835-8691 Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein MARC S. NURIK, ESQ. Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard EFTA00722581 Epstein v. Rothstein, et al. Case No. 50 2009CAO40800XXXXMB AG Epstein's First Request for Admissions to Edwards Page 6