Epstein Secrets

OOOCMBAG, Judge Crow entered an order on April 19, 2010 (attached as Exhibit H), in which he granted a protective order regarding the depositions of Michael Fisten and Rick Fandrey, investigators previously employed by Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler ("RRA"). As the Court may recall, RRA represented Jane Doe pri

Adler ("RRA"). As the Court may recall, RRA represented Jane Doe prior to its implosion. 5 EFTA00728108 16. While Epstein sought to depose Mr. Fisten and Mr. Fandrey regarding their knowledge of Scott Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, the Court nevertheless entered a protective order prohibiting their de

- 80232, 08-80380, 08-80381, 08-80993, 08- 80994 C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. 7 Edwards, Esq. Farmer , Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2822 Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Cas

t "A" at pp. 169-171, 185-186. Edwards counsel made clear that Edwards would not answer "any questions" related to the alleged investigation done by Fisten and other investigators. Therefore, it was clear that despite the fact that Mr. Edwards and Mr. Fisten discussed Epstein and the Jane Doe matters w

stein v. Epstein, 519 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). The financial information sought here is clearly relevant. (b) Topic Specific Objections As to Michael Fisten Should Be Overruled and Edwards Should be Compelled To Return For Deposition to Testify to Same and to His Newly Filed Affidavit 6. Michael Fiste

ces of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Gary M. Farmer, Jr., Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00728270 Epstein v. Rothstein. et at Page 7 Fax Attorneys for Defen

t "A" at pp. 169-171, 185-186. Edwards counsel made clear that Edwards would not answer "any questions" related to the alleged investigation done by Fisten and other investigators. Therefore, it was clear that despite the fact that Mr. Edwards and Mr. Fisten discussed Epstein and the Jane Doe matters w

stein v. Epstein, 519 So.2d 1042 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). The financial information sought here is clearly relevant. (b) Topic Specific Objections As to Michael Fisten Should Be Overruled and Edwards Should be Compelled To Return For Deposition to Testify to Same and to His Newly Filed Affidavit 6. Michael Fiste

ces of Marc S. Nurik One East Broward Boulevard Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Gary M. Farmer, Jr., Esq. Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue, Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 EFTA00728263 Epstein v. Rothstein. et at Page 7 Fax Attorneys for Defen

ld this court order production of same after an in camera inspection) must be redacted to secure the names of unsuspecting third-parties. Moreover, Michael Fisten (formerly an employee of RRA and now an employee/independent contractor of Mr. Edwards' firm) acted, upon information and belief, as a broker or mid

Beach, FL 33401-5012 561-659-8300 Fax: 561-835-8691 jagescabellsouth.net Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Estein Farmer , Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL 425 N. Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: 954-524-2820 Fax: 954-524-2822 [email protected] Counsel for