Epstein Secrets

t 14. RRA employed a number of investigators used in the prosecution of the Epstein Actions. Those investigators included, but were not limited to Michael Fisten ("Fisten") and Ken Jenne, ("Jenne"), employees of RRA. Fisten and Jenne were the primary investigators assigned to Edwards and to whom they reporte

yed a number of investigators used in the prosecution of the Epstein Actions. Those investigators included, but were not limited to Michael Fisten ("Fisten") and Ken Jenne, ("Jenne"), employees of RRA. Fisten and Jenne were the primary investigators assigned to Edwards and to whom they reported to cond

se in midst of the collapse of a firm in which he was a member, called Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"). 4. Rothstein was disbarred by the Florida Supreme Court on November 20, 2009. Subsequently, Rothstein was arrested, arraigned in federal court, pled guilty and ultimately was sentenced to fifty (50) year

ld this court order production of same after an in camera inspection) must be redacted to secure the names of unsuspecting third-parties. Moreover, Michael Fisten (formerly an employee of RRA and now an employee/independent contractor of Mr. Edwards' firm) acted, upon information and belief, as a broker or mid

Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, but also under the Constitution of the State of Florida, Art. I, Sect. 23. As summarized by the Florida Supreme Court in Shalom/1 v. State 553 So.2d 148, 150-51 (Fla. 1989): The right of privacy, assured to Florida's citizens, demands that individuals be free from

ld this court order production of same after an in camera inspection) must be redacted to secure the names of unsuspecting third-parties. Moreover, Michael Fisten (formerly an employee of RRA and now an employee/independent contractor of Mr. Edwards' firm) acted, upon information and belief, as a broker or mid

Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution, but also under the Constitution of the State of Florida, Art. I, Sect. 23. As summarized by the Florida Supreme Court in Shaktman v. State, 553 So.2d 148, 150-51 (Fla. 1989): The right of privacy, assured to Florida's citizens, demands that individuals be free fro

Who did [Mike Fisten] go to California to interview? MR. SCAROLA: That is work product and I instruct you not to answer. Id. at 170. Q. Did Mr. Fisten interview a person by the name of Michael Sanka? MR. SCAROLA: That is work product and I instruct you not to answer. Q. Did Mr. Fisten interview a

ranscript at 50, 54, 91, 100-104, 114, 126,-127, 155, 170, 181, 184-187, 192, 198-202, 205-206, 208-210, 212, 215-217; Exhibit 1. Forty years ago, the Florida Supreme Court, in Surf Drugs, Inc. v. Vermette, 236 So. 2d 108, 112 (Fla. 1970), gave this general definition of work product saying what it is and what it is no

name that topic?" Mr. Scarola: "Work product, instruct you not to answer." It goes on. "Who" -- at the bottom of page seven. "Who other than Mr. Fisten from an investigator -- from an internal investigator and RRA employee worked on doing investigations on the Epstein files?" Mr. Scarola: "Same o

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 -- the case had basically not been actively prosecuted in this court until June 2017 when the Florida Supreme Court issued its final ruling. So should the Court grant our motion, we did preserve the right to redepose Mr. Edwards on these issues. We feel not onl