Epstein Secrets

sexual abuse cases, during which Rush paraphrased aspects of the Epstein interview. Moving Affidavit of Michael Fisten, sworn to Sept. 14, 2010,1 8. Fisten also requested a copy of the Epstein interview, which request was likewise refused. Id. ¶ 10. The Daily News has not published any articles publicl

terview had been off-the-record and, moreover, would be of no help to his clients. Id. 8. Thereafter, on October 22, 2009, Rush also had a call with Michael Fisten, an investigator employed by Edwards on the sexual abuse cases, during which Rush paraphrased aspects of the Epstein interview. Moving Affidavit of

th v. Moore, 31 III3d 628, 818 2d 603 (2d Dep't 2006) 22 Tannenbaum v. City of New York, 30..3d 357, 819 Eig2d 4 (1st Dep't 2006) 15, 19 US. v Burke, 700 F.2d 70 (2d Cir. 1983) 26 U.S v. Marcos, 1990 WL 74521 ( June I, 1990) 26 U.S. v. Munsingwear, 340 U.S. 36 (1950) 13 Ulrich v. Coast D

eral law are "identical" to those under the applicable New York statute.— See Persky, supra. 2002 WL 31769704, at *3 (McKenna. J.). " Notably. Mr. Fisten claims he "wrote up a report memorializing what Rush had told me" shortly after his conversation with Mr. Rush (Fisten Aft*" I I) but chooses not to

. Inc., 4 121 F.R.D. 163 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) Ulrich v. Coast Dental Servs.. Inc., 15, 18 739 So. 2d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999) United States v. Burke, 3, 13 700 F.2d 70 (2d Cir. 1983) United States v. Monteleone 13 257 F.3d 210 (2d Cir. 2001) United States v. Treacv 19 603 F. Supp. 2d 670 (

eral law are "identical" to those under the applicable New York statute.— See Persky. supra. 2002 WL 31769704, at *3 (McKenna. J.). " Notably. Mr. Fisten claims he "wrote up a report memorializing what Rush had told me" shortly after his conversation with Mr. Rush (Fisten Aft*" I I) but chooses not to

. Inc., 4 121 F.R.D. 163 (E.D.N.Y. 1988) Ulrich v. Coast Dental Servs.. Inc., 15, 18 739 So. 2d 142 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999) United States v. Burke, 3, 13 700 F.2d 70 (2d Cir. 1983) United States v. Monteleone 13 257 F.3d 210 (2d Cir. 2001) United States v. Treacv 19 603 F. Supp. 2d 670 (