Epstein Secrets

n order to quantify the number of articles published about Ms. Maxwell, we used Nexis NewsDesk, a media monitoring and analytics service provided by LexisNexis. 18 EFTA00065739 named in 97 articles in the month of July 2019 alone. The level of press coverage spiked again in November 2019 when the Britis

tin foil, we explained to the Court at the initial bail hearing that Ms. Maxwell took this step to prevent the press from accessing her phone after the Second Circuit inadvertently unsealed certain court records with the phone number unredacted. (Tr. 55-56). Having now reviewed the discovery produced by the govern

ry • UNITED STATES Birth: 2/21/1985 NCA customised Auto-Closed No-Hit 20/07/2017 1 OF 1 RECORD(S) FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY Copyright 2017 LexisNexis a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All Rights Reserved. Address County Phone None Listed For internal use only SDNY_GM_00060310 CONFIDENTIAL -

aneous: Respondent: Sharon Churcher; Jeffrey Epstein DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 1:15cv7433 OTHER DOCKET CASE NUMBER: 1:17mc00025 U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 17-01625 FILING DATE: 9/21/2015 JURISDICTION: Diversity JUDGE: Robert W. Sweet NATURE OF SUIT: 320 Assault, Libel & Slander FILING TYPE: Civil

n order to quantify the number of articles published about Ms. Maxwell, we used Nexis NewsDesk, a media monitoring and analytics service provided by LexisNexis. 18 EFTA00154535 named in 97 articles in the month of July 2019 alone. The level of press coverage spiked again in November 2019 when the Britis

tin foil, we explained to the Court at the initial bail hearing that Ms. Maxwell took this step to prevent the press from accessing her phone after the Second Circuit inadvertently unsealed certain court records with the phone number unredacted. (Tr. 55-56). Having now reviewed the discovery produced by the govern

order to quantify the number of articles published about Ms. Maxwell, we used Nexis NewsDeslc, a media monitoring and analytics service provided by LexisNexis. 18 EFTA00094312 named in 97 articles in the month of July 2019 alone. The level of press coverage spiked again in November 2019 when the Britis

tin foil, we explained to the Court at the initial bail hearing that Ms. Maxwell took this step to prevent the press from accessing her phone after the Second Circuit inadvertently unsealed certain court records with the phone number unredacted. (Tr. 55-56). Having now reviewed the discovery produced by the govern

n order to quantify the number of articles published about Ms. Maxwell, we used Nexis NewsDesk, a media monitoring and analytics service provided by LexisNexis. 18 EFTA00093239 C6sea 2D-Z7-COCE2G0.40.1Nt Di)eu fikiti092102Fril El.e21/420 a Fd66 25 of 45 named in 97 articles in the month of July 2019 al

9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 law of the statute, by its structure, favors release. The Supreme Court has and the Second Circuit has advised us that a very limited number of people should be detained prior to trial because of the statute's structure, and the government nowher

stead, the courts simply cited to language from a Second Circuit decision that stated that the CVRA does not give

bstantive discussion of whether CVRA rights apply in criminal cases before the filing of charges. Instead, the courts simply cited to language from a Second Circuit decision that stated that the CVRA does not give victims any rights against defendants until those defendants have been convicted'!’—a holding clearl

t grant victims any rights against individuals who have not been convicted of a crime.”” (quoting In re W.R. Huff Asset Mgmt. Co., 409 F.3d 555, 564 (2d Cir. 2005))). '3 Of course, a defendant cannot be ordered to pay restitution as part of his sentence until he has been found guilty. See 18 U.S.C. § 3664

stead, the courts simply cited to language from a Second Circuit decision that stated that the CVRA does not give

nd sixth amendment Search Type: Terms and Connectors Narrowed by: Content Type Narrowed by Secondary Materials Sources: Law Reviews and Journals w LexisNexis® | About LexisNexis | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Copyright © 2019 LexisNexis DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017603 --- PAGE BREAK --- CRI

"the CVRA does not grant victims any rights against individuals who have not been convicted of a crime. W.R. Huff Asset Mgmt. Co., 409 F.3d 555, 564 (2d Cir. 2005))). (quoting Jn re 3 Of course, a defendant cannot be ordered to pay restitution as part of his sentence until he has been found guilty. See /

bstantive discussion of whether CVRA rights apply in criminal cases before the filing of charges. Instead, the courts simply cited to language from a Second Circuit decision that stated that the CVRA does not give victims any rights against defendants until those defendants have been convicted !!* - a holding cle

d sixth amendment Search Type: Terms and Connectors Narrowed by: Content Type Narrowed by Secondary Materials Sources: Law Reviews and Journals w LexisNexis® | About LexisNexis | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Copyright © 2019 LexisNexis DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017714 --- PAGE BREAK --- ART

nt asserts has been harmed by a crime or who self-identifies as such qualifies as a "victim"); cf. In re WR. Huff Asset Mgmt. Co., 409 F.3d 555, 561 (2d Cir. 2005) (holding that the CVRA does not grant victims any rights against individuals not convicted of a crime, but the government can attempt to obtain

nd sixth amendment Search Type: Terms and Connectors Narrowed by: Content Type Narrowed by Secondary Materials Sources: Law Reviews and Journals w LexisNexis® | About LexisNexis | Privacy Policy | Terms & Conditions | Copyright © 2019 LexisNexis DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017635 --- PAGE BREAK --- ART

ongressional determination, blocking defense efforts to obtain pretrial discovery about government witnesses. For example, in United States v. Coppa, the Second Circuit overturned the district court's approval of a scheduling order requiring the government to identify its witnesses in advance of trial. +3? The distri

law, which goes into effect Wednesday, they should note the legislation's wide scope and its overlap with existing paid leave laws, attorneys say. LexisNexis l'',,LAw360 Rising Stars LAW FIRMS Ademi & O'Reilly Ahdoot & Wolfson Akerman LLP Akin Gump Arnold & Porter Baker Botts Berger Montague Berm

e Court U.S. Army U.S. Attorneys Office U.S. Census Bureau U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit U.S. Department of Commerce U.S. Department of Defense U.S. Department of Health and Human Servic