3
Shared Docs
1
Same-Page
3 / 5
Mentions
required by Rule 8 "must simply 'give the defendant fair notice of what the plaintiffs claim is and the grounds upon which it rests' ") (quoting Conley, 355 U.S. at 47, 78 S.Ct. 99). When presented with a 12(6)(6) motion, the district court may not consider matters outside of the pleadings without
0 (hereinafter "Supp. Al-Wohai- bi Aff."). a. Status of the PIF In Filler v. Hanvit Bank, a case with facts very similar to those presented here, the Second Circuit reiterated Dole Food's requirement of direct ownership for instru- mentality status. Two defendants were commercial banks majority-owned by the Ko
t of the Princes’ ac- tions. [22-24] Pursuant to the Second Cir- cuit’s instruction, the Court must first de- termine whe
very least, discovery should be ordered circumspectly and only to verify allega- tions of specific facts crucial to an immuni- ty determination.”)). The Second Circuit has instructed “that generally a plaintiff may be allowed limited discovery with re- spect to the jurisdictional issue; but until [plaintiff] has sho
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017848 →eyond doubt, “even when the complaint is liberally con- strued, that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts which would entitle him to relief.” Id.; Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a) requires that a complaint contain “a short and
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017890 →bia’s relationship to NCB. The Supreme Court and Second Circuit agree that there are certain circumstances in whi
Accordingly, the only dispute regarding SHC’s status is whether it is an organ of the Kingdom. In Filler v. Hanvit Bank, 378 F.3d 213 (2d Cir.2004), the Second Circuit considered various factors to determine whether an entity could be considered an organ of a foreign sovereign. Jd. at 217. The factors include: (1)
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017917 →cts and issues and to dispose of unmeritorious claims.” Swierkiewicz vy. Sorema, N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 512, 122 S.Ct. 992, 152 L.Ed.2d 1 (2002) (citing Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 47, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957), Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence & Coordination Unit, 507 U.S. 163,
Page: HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017925 →Entities connected to both Conley and Second Circuit

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON
United States
LOCATION
Department of Justice
ORGANIZATION
Prince Andrew
PERSONthe Southern District
LOCATIONJane Doe
PERSON
Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Michael Cohen
PERSON
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION
Bradley Edwards
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Southern District of New York
ORGANIZATION
Virginia Giuffre
PERSON
Donald Trump
PERSON
David Boies
PERSON
Michael Jackson
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
New York
LOCATION
Stephen Hawking
PERSON