Epstein Secrets

nd Second Second Trial Counsel for Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein SERVICE LIST 6 EFTA00793760 Jack Scarola Sears Denn Scarola. Barnhart yard & Shipley, P.A. Nichole J. Segal : ' . • .. : : .. . - . ., . • A. 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Co

inti i. ounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates ., Suite 250 32211 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for LM., E.W. and Jane Doe 5 EFTA00793753 EXHIBIT A EFTA00793754 IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE H1- 1 EENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No.

ards Jack A. Goldberger 4 - to op .. - . . eiss, P.A. Paul Cassell Suite 1400 0730 ' II Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel for LM., E.W. and Jane Doe o- ounse or • ainti i. ounter-Defendant Jeffrey Epstein Jay Howell Jay Howell & Associates ., Suite 250 32211 Limited Intervenor Co-Counsel fo

SCHAUER,TIFFANY WHEELER,DENNIS J BARNHART,F GREGORY GEISLER,PETER BEYER,LAWRE

QUINN,OLIVER H LOCKER,NANCY OWEN,JANE D CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD KELLER,MICHAEL

e many other cases in which Fowler White represent parties adverse to clients represented by Farmer Jaffe and/or its co-counsel Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley. Farmer Jaffe claims that discovery is needed in order to determine "the true extent of its damages ...". This lacks any credible basis.

re at issue here. See DE 6351, p. 23. Accordingly, the request to intervene should be denied. To the extent this Court will consider L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe's Joinder in Motion for Order to Show Cause and Motion for Discovery, to Access Sanctions and Costs for Other Appropriate Relief (DE 6345), this resp

stay does need to be heard. THE COURT: Thank you. Mr. Scarola. MR. SCAROLA: Your Honor, Jack Scarola, David Vitale from Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart and Shipley; and Mr. Phil Burlington of Burlington and Rochenbach, on behalf of Mr. Edwards in this matter. As has been acknowledged, we have not

?" Refusal to answer. Fifth Amendment. At page 73, "I would like to know whether you ever had any physical contact with the person referred to as Jane Doe in that federal complaint." Refusal to answer. Page 24. "Did you ever have any physical contact with Fifth Amendment. Refusal to answer. Page 26

v Epstein et al" 12/19/2018 Boles Schiller Flexner $500,000 Jeffrey Epstein "Payment pursuant to settlement" 1/4/2019 Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart PA S7,000,000 Jeffrey Epstein "Settlement payment as per Section 2 of settlement [agreement]" 26 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. IL CRIM. P. 6

e suit. 5 Gut. thLink & Rockenbach, P.A. Lesley Groff 19 $5,509,464 Jeffrey Epstein Link & Rockenbach represented Groff and Epstein in the Jane Doe 43 lawsuit. It is possible that these payments were made solely for the benefit of Epstein. The transaction dates coincide with the lawsuit. " Se

ards filed a civil sot against Jeffrey Epstein to recover damages for his sexual assault of L.M. See Complaint, LM. v. Epstein, (Exhibit “V”). 3 47. Jane Doe’s federal complaint indicated that she sought damages of more than $50,000,000. Listing the amount of damages sought in the complaint was in accord wit

010 a copy of the foregoing has been served via Fax and U.S. Mail to all those on the attached service list. Jack Scarola Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach, FL 33409 By: 42 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013360 --- PAGE BREAK --- SERVICE LIST Christopher E. Kn