Epstein Secrets

Petition was furnished via email this day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, M. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter- Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Philip M. Burlington

ATE TRIALS BECAUSE THE CLAIMS INVOLVE INTERRELATED FACTUAL ISSUES AND, THEREFORE, A RISK OF INCONSISTENT VERDICTS EXISTS. "[A] severance under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.270(b), while residing in the sound discretion of the trial court upon an appropriate showing, should remain the exception." Travelers

, Mr. Epstein took a day long deposition of attorney Brad Edwards (who is himself represented by Jack Scarola of Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart and Shipley), and the questions were meant to invade 3 EFTA00728320 Case No.: 502009CA040800)O0O(MBAG Motion for Protective Order attorney-client and work-

COTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant. MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER L.M., pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.280(c), hereby files this Motion for Protective Order to prevent the depositions of any private investigators who are working on or hav

quest was furnished via email this 14th day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] scarolateam@searcylaw

ify them on his Exhibit List. Edwards has provided not a single reason why this Court should expedite its careful review and enforce the mandate of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.440 (Petition for Writ of Mandamus) and determine if the severance of the interrelated and dependent actions should continue to one jur

rrect copy of this Petition was furnished via email this 12th day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. o- ounse en yard an counter- PlainOT Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlin ton & Rockenbach P.A. 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Cou

Edwards filed his motion to set case for trial, 7 EFTA00793699 the case was not at issue, and thus, the scheduled trial may not proceed based on Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1440.5 (App. 15). Upon receiving Edwards' Supplement to his Motion for Separate Trials, Epstein's counsel immediately researched the Rule

IFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of this Motion was furnished via email this 8th day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Shipley, P.A. Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlington & Rockenbach, P.A. 350 1 o- ounse or ee ant Co

BECAUSE THE CIRCUIT COURT MUST REMOVE THE CASE FROM THE TRIAL DOCKET IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THE MANDATE SET FORTH IN RULE 1.440. In violation of Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.440, this case was not "at issue" when Edwards filed his Motion to Set Case for Trial. Therefore, the circuit court's ensuing Order set

true and correct copy of the foregoing was faxed and mailed this ac day of August, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, E., 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Palm Beach, FL 33409. 2.-O Joseph L. Ackerman, Jr. Fla. Bar No. 235954 WASOPOWROSFIlit-ATI chgnuattS. Asa

ntitled to fees and costs. H. ANALYSIS The requirements for a valid proposal for settlement are set forth in section 768.79, Florida Statutes, and Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.442. The offer of judgment statute and rule must be strictly construed, as they are in derogation of the common law rule that each party