Epstein Secrets

ke the deposition of Tommy Mattola. That assertion is untrue. Mr. Mattola's deposition was set by the law finn of Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart and Shipley. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at 116. 74. Edwards gave notice that he intended to take David Copperfield's deposition. Edwards possessed a l

an provide explanation. See Epstein Deposition, February 17, 2010, at 11-12, 30-31 (Deposition Attachment # 7). 9. Epstein also sexually assaulted E.W., beginning when she was 14 years old and did so on numerous occasions. See E.W. Depo., Attachment #4 at 215-216. 10. Another of the minor girls Ep

did not notify E.W. and L.M. that a plea agreement had already been reached that would block federal prosecution of Epstein. Nor did the FBI notify E.W. and L.M. of any of the parts of the plea agreement. Nor did the FBI or other federal authorities confer with E.W. and L.M. about the plea. See id.

ponse was furnished via email this 19th day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry David P. Vitale, Jr. Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33409 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter- Plaintiff Bradley I Edwards Philip M. Burlingto

f from Stay with Request for Expedited Consideration" and as grounds states: Introduction No legal standing or basis exists for non-parties, L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe, to "join" any appellate motion or action by Edwards.' The unnecessary intervention appearance below by E.W., L.M. and Jane Doe, whil

2 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 954-524-2820 954-524-2822 - fax Attorneys for Defendant, LM. Jack Scarola, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. West Palm Beach, FL 33409 686-6300 383-9424 F Attorneys for Defendant Bradley Edwards Jack Alan Goldberger, Es

quialism, discussion, conversation or agreement. C. "Plaintiff' means L.M. (LM. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028051XXXXMB), E.W. (E.W. v. Jeffrey Epstein, Palm Beach County Case #502008CA028058XXXXMB), Jane Doe (Jane Doe v. Jeffrey Epstein, United States District Court Case #

rrect copy of this Petition was furnished via email this 12th day of March, 2018: Jack Scarola Karen E. Terry Searcy, Denny, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. o- ounse en yard an counter- PlainOT Bradley J. Edwards Nichole J. Segal Burlin ton & Rockenbach P.A. 350 Co-Counsel for Defendant/Cou

t court. 2 At the March 8, 2018 hearing, University of Utah Law Professor, Paul G. Cassell, Esq., appeared pro hac vice below for non-parties L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, on a limited confidentiality issue not before this Court. On behalf of non-parties, L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe, Mr. Cassell filed an Uno

cases in which Fowler White represent parties adverse to clients represented by Farmer Jaffe and/or its co-counsel Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart & Shipley. Farmer Jaffe claims that discovery is needed in order to determine "the true extent of its damages ...". This lacks any credible basis. If Farmer

e any detail—much less an unequivocal command—as to what Fowler White is to do with the disc at issue. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND Although L.M., E.W., and Jane Doe have sought to join in the motion for order to show cause, they have not been granted leave to intervene in this action. The motion to

n Goldberger, Esq. Atterbu Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Counsel for Plainti Jack Scarola, Esq. Jack P. Hill, Esq. Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A. Counsel tor vetwn-ciant JOU Bruce Reinhart, Esq. Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen Respectfully su By: ROB JR., ESQ. Florida Bar No. 2

, Vegas Cabaret, Spearmint Rhino, T's Lounge, Pure Platinum, Solid Gold, and The Body Shop. Substantial discovery will take place in that matter of E.W.'s co-workers, supervisors and others that may have Information regarding the claims she asserted against Epstein. Epstein should be afforded that sa