Epstein Secrets

ale, FL 33301 Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. Fanner Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fred Haddad, Esq. 1 Financial Plaza Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Tonja Haddad Coleman, Esquire Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, M. 315 SE 7th Street, S

on; 5) malice; 6) damages. Duval Jewelry Co. v. Smith, 102 Fla. 717, 136 So. 878, 880 (1931). The fourth element is at issue here. In Goldstein v. Sabella, 88 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 1956), the Supreme Court of Florida explained the meaning of probable cause in the context of a malicious prosecution action a

Counsel for Defendant Scott Rothstein Co-Counsel for Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards 2 A19 EFTA00798185 Tonja Haddad Coleman Fred Haddad 315 S.E. Seventh Street, Suite 301 Haddad & Navarro, PLLC Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 1 Financial Plaza, Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale FL 33394 Co-Co

o him, in the validity of his claim." See Wright v. Yurko, 446 So. 2d 1162, 1166 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984) (defining probable cause) (citing Goldstein v. Sabella, 88 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 1956)). Bifurcating the trial and first addressing Plaintiff's case and damages against Rothstein and the related issue of wha

Lauderdale, FL 33301 Brac lwards, E . Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fred Haddad, Es 1 Financial Plaza Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Toria Haddad Coleman, Es uire Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, 315 SE 7th Street, Suite

l Jewelry Co. v. Smith, 102 Fla. 717, 136 So. 878, 880 (1931). The fourth element, the absence of probable cause, is at issue here. In Goldstein v. Sabella, 88 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 1956), the Supreme Court of Florida explained the meaning of probable cause in the context of a malicious prosecution action as

rdale, FL 33301 Bra . .. a lwards E . Farmer Jaffe Weissing Edwards Fistos Lehrman 425 N Andrews Avenue Suite 2 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 Fred Haddad, Es . 1 Financial Plaza Suite 2612 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Toria Haddad Coleman, Es uire Law Offices of Tonja Haddad, 315 SE 7th Street, Suit

l Jewelry Co. v. Smith, 102 Fla. 717, 136 So. 878, 880 (1931). The fourth element, the absence of probable cause, is at issue here. In Goldstein v. Sabella, 88 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 1956), the Supreme Court of Florida explained the meaning of probable cause in the context of a malicious prosecution action as