Epstein Secrets

stein and Edwards' law firm of which he was a partner. Despite this, Edwards voluntarily produced documents that he now claims are privileged to Mr. Scherer in the Razorback litigation. Florida law clearly demonstrates that this voluntary production constituted a waiver. Because Edwards and the Razorbac

Disclosure to Adversary Constitutes Waiver As a threshold basis for waiver, it is undisputed that the law firm of Conrad Scherer, through attorney William Scherer, represented investors in (e.g., victims of) Rothstein Rosenfeldt & Adler's Ponzi scheme, in the Razorback litigation. These investors were unquesti

hat the Epstein case was a real case and ultimately invested money. A copy of the transcript of this hearing is attached hereto as Exhibit "3". Mr. Scherer's remarks appear on pages 17-22.2 On August 13, 2010, Bankruptcy Judge Raymond Ray ordered in response to a subpoena from Epstein the appointment of

to making approximately $13 million dollars worth of investments into phoney settlements by using pending real cases. Counsel for those investors, William Scherer, whose is also a member of the Creditor's Committee in the RRA bankruptcy, represented to the bankruptcy court that a number of his clients and the

hat the Epstein case was a real case and ultimately invested money. A copy of the transcript of this hearing is attached hereto as Exhibit "3". Mr. Scherer's remarks appear on pages 17-22.2 On August 13, 2010, Bankruptcy Judge Raymond Ray ordered in response to a subpoena from Epstein the appointment of

to making approximately $13 million dollars worth of investments into phoney settlements by using pending real cases. Counsel for those investors, William Scherer, whose is also a member of the Creditor's Committee in the RRA bankruptcy, represented to the bankruptcy court that a number of his clients and the

ule applies here. On March 8, 2018, Edwards' counsel, Jack Scarola, implied (incorrectly) that the e-mails were shared with Epstein's counsel by Mr. Scherer, counsel for Razorback. Thus, Edwards admits that he voluntarily furnished the e-mails to Mr. Scherer. Razorback sought these allegedly privileged

uments identified on his 159-page privilege log. In addition, Edwards' counsel suggested that Link & Rockenbach received the evidence from attorney William Scherer (Razorback's counsel). Although that is inaccurate, it demonstrates that any potential work-product protection has been waived by virtue of producti

proccedino were had: 24 to me. 25 Repotted By: Mutant Franz= 25 MR. LICHTMAN: Correct, Judge. Page 2 Page 4 1 APPEARANOIS 1 THE COURT: Mr. Scherer. 7 3 BERGER 8/910BILMAN. try 2 MR. SCHERER: Yes, sir, your Honor. CHARLES H. WHOA" ESQUIRE 3 I'm William Scherer and I'm here on behalf of a

4 1 APPEARANOIS 1 THE COURT: Mr. Scherer. 7 3 BERGER 8/910BILMAN. try 2 MR. SCHERER: Yes, sir, your Honor. CHARLES H. WHOA" ESQUIRE 3 I'm William Scherer and I'm here on behalf of a 4 s on WINIIM Ea Emote 4 number of victims in the State Court action, as 6 CONRAD & SCHEItElt, by $ Wen aS the ch

hat the Epstein case was a real case and ultimately invested money. A copy of the transcript of this hearing is attached hereto as Exhibit "3". Mr. Scherer's remarks appear on pages 17-22.2 On August 13, 2010, Bankruptcy Judge Raymond Ray ordered in response to a subpoena from Epstein the appointment of

to making approximately $13 million dollars worth of investments into phoney settlements by using pending real cases. Counsel for those investors, William Scherer, whose is also a member of the Creditor's Committee in the RRA bankruptcy, represented to the bankruptcy court that a number of his clients and the