Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
imminent peril. See Gatto v. Pubblx Supermarket, Inc., 387 So. 2d 377, 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (holding that where there was no evidence to show that Gatto was placed in fear of imminent peril, there was no assault). In fact, the plaintiff does not even allege that Mr. Epstein touched her. Thus, there
language of the plaintiff's complaint and construe Count I as a claim for common-law assault, that claim would also fail. As the court explained in Lay v. Kremer, 411 So. 2d 1347, 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), an assault is "an intentional, unlawful offer of corporal injury to another by force, or force unlawful
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
imminent peril. See Gatto v. Pubblx Supermarket, Inc., 387 So. 2d 377, 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (holding that where there was no evidence to show that Gatto was placed in fear of imminent peril, there was no assault). In fact, the plaintiff does not even allege that Mr. Epstein touched her. Thus, there
language of the plaintiff's complaint and construe Count I as a claim for common-law assault, that claim would also fail. As the court explained in Lay v. Kremer, 411 So. 2d 1347, 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), an assault is "an intentional, unlawful offer of corporal injury to another by force, or force unlawful
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
imminent peril. See Gatto v. Pubblx Supermarket, Inc., 387 So. 2d 377, 379 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (holding that where there was no evidence to show that Gatto was placed in fear of imminent peril, there was no assault). In fact, the plaintiff does not even allege that Mr. Epstein touched her. Thus, there
language of the plaintiff's complaint and construe Count I as a claim for common-law assault, that claim would also fail. As the court explained in Lay v. Kremer, 411 So. 2d 1347, 1349 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982), an assault is "an intentional, unlawful offer of corporal injury to another by force, or force unlawful
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (39)
Entities connected to both Gatto and Lay v. Kremer
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON8 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON7 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
FE
Ferre
PERSON6 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
Kenneth Marra
PERSON6 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
SU
Sullivan
PERSON6 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
Bill Richardson
PERSON6 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON6 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
Choice, Inc.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
Coconut Grove
LOCATION5 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
RC
Robert D. Critton
PERSON5 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON5 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
Plaza Materials Corp.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
FI
Finnegan
PERSON5 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
DirectTV, Inc.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
MP
Michael J. Pike
PERSON5 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
Marshall County Bd
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
Rochester Med
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
Marshal County Gas Dist
ORGANIZATION4 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
BE
Beaulieu
PERSON4 w/ Gatto·3 w/ Lay
Jeffrey Marc Herman
PERSON5 w/ Gatto·2 w/ Lay