Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
a civil remedy" (citing Villazon v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc., 843 So. 2d 842, 852 (Fla. 2003)). See also, e.g., Miami Herald Publ'g Co. v. Ferre, 636 F. Supp. 970 (S.D. Fla. 1985) (King, C.J.) (holding that violation of Florida's criminal extortion statute does not give rise to a civil cause
ly addresses part of a complaint suspends the time to respond to the entire complaint, not just to the claims that are the subject of the motion"); Schwartz v. Berry College, Inc., No. Civ.A. 4:96CV338-HLM, 1997 WL 579166, *1 (N.D. Ga. July 3, 1997) (noting that there is significant case law to support the position that "when
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
a civil remedy" (citing Villazon v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc., 843 So. 2d 842, 852 (Fla. 2003)). See also, e.g., Miami Herald Publ'g Co. v. Ferre, 636 F. Supp. 970 (S.D. Fla. 1985) (King, C.J.) (holding that violation of Florida's criminal extortion statute does not give rise to a civil cause
ly addresses part of a complaint suspends the time to respond to the entire complaint, not just to the claims that are the subject of the motion"); Schwartz v. Berry College, Inc., No. Civ.A. 4:96CV338-HLM, 1997 WL 579166, *1 (N.D. Ga. July 3, 1997) (noting that there is significant case law to support the position that "when
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
a civil remedy" (citing Villazon v. Prudential Health Care Plan, Inc., 843 So. 2d 842, 852 (Fla. 2003)). See also, e.g., Miami Herald Publ'g Co. v. Ferre, 636 F. Supp. 970 (S.D. Fla. 1985) (King, C.J.) (holding that violation of Florida's criminal extortion statute does not give rise to a civil cause
ly addresses part of a complaint suspends the time to respond to the entire complaint, not just to the claims that are the subject of the motion"); Schwartz v. Berry College, Inc., No. Civ.A. 4:96CV338-HLM, 1997 WL 579166, *1 (N.D. Ga. July 3, 1997) (noting that there is significant case law to support the position that "when
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (39)
Entities connected to both Ferre and Schwartz v. Berry College, Inc.
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON17 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON16 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
MP
Michael J. Pike
PERSON15 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
RC
Robert D. Critton
PERSON14 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
Bill Richardson
PERSON14 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
Kenneth Marra
PERSON13 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
Home Assurance Co.
ORGANIZATION13 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON12 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON12 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
Plaza Materials Corp.
ORGANIZATION11 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
MA
Mantooth
PERSON11 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
Coconut Grove
LOCATION8 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
Jeffrey Marc Herman
PERSON9 w/ Ferre·2 w/ Schwartz
IE
Indecent Exposure
PERSON8 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
Miami Herald Publ'g Co.
ORGANIZATION8 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
George W. Bush
PERSON7 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
C.
C.J.
PERSON7 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
Prudential Health Care Plan
ORGANIZATION7 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
GA
Gatto
PERSON6 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz
Choice, Inc.
ORGANIZATION5 w/ Ferre·3 w/ Schwartz