Epstein Secrets

F.Supp. 970 (S.D. Fla. 1985) 3. Mantooth v. Richards, 557 So.2d 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) 4. Lay v. Kremer, 411 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) 5. Wright v. Yurko, 446 So.2d 1162, 1165 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).; 6. American Diversified Ins. Srvcs., Inc. v. Union Fidelity Life Ins., 439 So.2d 904 (Fla. 3d

K T. LUTTIER, P.A. JEFFREY C. PEPIN MICHAEL J. PIKE HEATHER McNAMARA RUDA 2 FLORIDA BOARD CERTIFIED CVO-TRIAL LAWYER Sent by Fax and U.S. Mail Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP April 13, 2009 Re: Doe II v. Epstein, et al. Case No. 09-80469-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON ADELQUI.LBENAVENTE rmuk

F.Supp. 970 (S.D. Fla. 1985) 3. Mantooth v. Richards, 557 So.2d 646 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) 4. Lay v. Kremer, 411 So.2d 1347 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) 5. Wright v. Yurko, 446 So.2d 1162, 1165 (Fla. 5th DCA 1984).; 6. American Diversified Ins. Srvcs., Inc. v. Union Fidelity Life Ins., 439 So.2d 904 (Fla. 3d

K T. LUTTIER, P.A. JEFFREY C. PEPIN MICHAEL 1. PIKE HEATHER McNAMARA RUDA 2 FLORIDA BOARD CERTIFIED CVO-TRIAL LAWYER Sent by Fax and U.S. Mail Isidro M. Garcia, Esq. Garcia Law firm P.A. A LIMITED LIABILITY PARTNERSHIP April 13, 2009 Re: Doe II v. Epstein, et al. Case No. 09-80469-Civ-MARRA/JOHNSON AD

ssarily, an emotional one.' This rule of exclusion 'is directed at evidence which inflames the jury or appeals improperly to the jury's emotions."' Wright v. State, 19 So. 3d 277 (Fla. 2009). Additionally, it is well-settled law that evidence of prior convictions, acquittals or arrests is irrelevant i

f the Federal Bureau of Investigations 16. Spencer Kuvin, Esquire 17. Theodore Leopold, Esquire 18. Rinaldo Rizzo 19. Adam Horowitz, Esquire 20. Isidro M. Garcia, Esquire 21. All of the Lawyers who Represented Victims of Jeffrey Epstein. This is so overbroad that Epstein cannot possibly make a determination