Epstein Secrets

te will then revert to *Show Compliance with FARIa• until expiration of the certificate on 1 August, 1990. Sincerely yours, Cheryl BZoyd fotlS.J. Wright Valean Project Pilot SDNY_GM_02759971 SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER PARAGRAPHS 7, 8, 9, 10, 15, and 17 EFTA_00246893 EFTA01331356 SDM'_GM_0275997

ctions. AC43.13-2 chtptar 1 pere. 1 -47$44-0-0-10-11 -12 SA1Research Aviation co. drawings. m1300517, 140041$ end tincture! analysis contained in Baird battens CIER sort Mo. C-1.254 1242022 Installation. crew t 2. Installed the following in accords, with AC26-44, all actions aid Aintanch Aviation

informants, Ewing, and other federal employees pur- l?, Ban v. Maned, 360 US. 564, 575, 79 S.Ct. 1335. 1341, 3 L.Edld 1434 (1959). Accord Ev- an v. Wright 582 F.2.<1 20, 21 (sth Or.19711). 13. Barr, 360 U.S. at 575.79 SQ. 1341; Nortaenj McShane, 332 F.2d 855.858 (5th ar.I964), . denied 380 U.S. NI,

...36 (3d Cir.2003). A District Court's determina- tion whether a cooperation agreement has been breached is a legal conclusion. Unit- ed States v. Baird, 218 F2d 221, 229 (3d Cir.2000). MI findings of fact are re- viewed for clear error. See Bell, 414 F.Sd at 478 (reviewing findings of fact related

vacy for victims' confidential records). 88 Roe v. Wade, 410 U.S. 113, 152 (1973). 89 Whalen v. Roe, 429 U.S. 589, 599-600 (1977). 9 Eisenstadt v. Baird, 405 U.S. 438, 453 (1972); see also Carey v. Population Servs. Int'l, 431 U.S. 678, 684-85 (1977). DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017738 --- PAGE BR

d with fairness." In addition, the vicinage provision of 196 18 U.S.C.A. 3771(a)(8) (West 2004 & Supp. 2005). 197 Td. 3771 (a)(8). 198 See generally Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure 321, at 357-58. 199 See supra notes 158-174 and accompanying text. DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017740 --- PAGE B