Epstein Secrets

KENT MD,SEBASTIAN PORRECA,VANESSA WRIGHT,SUZANNE FURLO,PAUL W TOWN OF PALM B

MCGOVERN,KEVIN M LANE,JEFFREY MILETO,FRANCESCO CERIALE,MELISSA S NEWQUIS

ssarily, an emotional one.' This rule of exclusion 'is directed at evidence which inflames the jury or appeals improperly to the jury's emotions."' Wright v. State, 19 So. 3d 277 (Fla. 2009). Here, the below-listed items undeniably have no bearing on Edwards's abuse of process or malicious prosecution

114. Victim's employment records from IHOP 115. Police report of Juan Alessi theft at Jeffrey Epstein's home 116. Victim's Medical Records from Milton Girls Juvenile Facility 117. Victim's Medical Records from Dr. Randee Speciale 118. Victim's Medical Records from Wellington Regional Hospital 1

ted a `very lim- ited and seemingly judicious restriction,' 501 F.2d, at 151, nevertheless considered it versible *230 error. Citing United States Wright, 160 U.S.App.D.C. 57, 68, 489 .2d 1181, 1192 (1973), the court found that the Fifth Amendment prohibited the disclosure condition imposed in this

d her grandmother's car and her grandmother pressed charges. Rivera was ordered to a drug program at Milton Girls Juvenile Residential Facility in Milton, Florida. Rivera stated she was in the drug program for 5 months, one week and 3 days. EFTA00178032 FD-302a (Rev. 10-6-95) 31E-MM-108062 Contin

her Florida state and federal courts. See, SCI Funeral Svs. of Fla., Inc. v. Henry, 839 So. 2d 702, n.4 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (“As the Levin court cited Wright v. Yurko, 446 So. 2d 1162, 1165 (Fla. 5th DCA, 1984), with approval, presumably the cause of action for malicious prosecution continues to exist and

1966), It is not enough for the —— party merely to assert that an issue of fact does exist. Fisel v. Wynns, 667 So.2d 761, 764 (Fla.1996); Landers v. Milton, 370 So.2d 368, 370 (Fla.1979) (same). | Moreover, it is well-recognized that the non-moving party faced with a summary judgment motion supported by