Epstein Secrets

accourts at UBS AG StanfordBranch and shays of MoneyFad are rot tared by the FDIC. Through tie b7A, cash balances re swept to deposit accounts at UBS AG New von Brant, ad UBS AG Cancun Branch. These deposits are not insured byte FDIC. Balances held at tie LES AG Cayman Branch are temp:only imposed

. The Fnn. together wish certain aff Pates. has also Purchased oniplenvental instance The mai mum amount psi *le to al thatb clients, collet...fib Linde this protection is 5500 million as of Decerrter 10, 2016. Sttject to the poky cordlike-4 End lenitations, cash at the firm is further protected to

SRIEL I, Cash and money balances may include available cash balances. UBS Bank VSA deposit account. VBS roc instal Deposit Program Bank accounts, UBS AG Stamford Branch deposit account balances and money market mutual fund sweep balances See the important information about war statement on the last

apacity. lhe FM. together wish certain aft tires. has also purchased towIterwmal innate The mai mum amount payable to al elgble clients, cotton/et Linde' this protection is 1500 million as of Detente 10, 2016. Woad to the poky cording" at limitations, cash at the firm is further protected to up to

accounts at UBS AG StanfordBranch and shies of Money Ards are rot rased by the FCC. Through the DA, cash balances we swept to depose accounts at UBS AG New Von Brarth a-d UBS AG C SSW, Branch. These deposits are not inured by the FDIC. Balances held at he 1165 AG Cayman Branch are tenwanly ("posed

ar capacity. the Frt. together with certain aff Ares, has also Pedaled 94Plentental innate the mai mum amount pgrble to at ek)b.eclicts, colklwek Linde' this protection is S500 million as of December 10, 2016. Stbact to the poky cordite: a at Imitations, cash a the firm is further protected to up

t of Corr. Servs., 435 F. App’x 52 (2d Cir, 2011) eceeccesescscsnescescsneecescsnsecescsnseeesesnseeessseseeesesnseeesnseseersnseseeeensess Arndt v. UBS AG, 342 F. Supp. 2d 132 (E.D.N.Y. 2004) .......... Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 8. Ct. 1937 (2009) ..eeceecseseceesseeeeeteesteeeeee Aziz v. Alcolac, Inc., 65

lay Nat’] Bank. Ltd., 504 F.3d 254 (2d Cir, 2007) ceccccsessccccsntsceccsnseeeccsnseeeccunsececcsnseeecesnseceenseseeeseanseeeseanseerenseseetensess Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC, 384 F. Supp. 2d 571 (E.D.N-Y. QOOS) eecccsessccccsneececcsnsecesesnseeesesesecesnseseersnsesseesnseseesnseseeesnsesenesnseeceesnse