Epstein Secrets

Charges "Likely False." The Washington Times (12/30, Scarborough, 567K) reports Michael Isikoff of Yahoo News, who was "an early public conduit for Christopher Steele's anti-Trump dossier, now says the former British spy's sensational Russia collusion charges lack apparent evidence and are 'likely false."' According

are 'likely false."' According to the Daily Caller, Isikoff this month told John Ziegler of Mediaite, When you actually get into the details of the Steele dossier, the specific allegations, we have not seen the evidence to support them, and in fact, there is good grounds to think that some of the more

y figured out they had no evidence of collusion." Giuliani added, "Collusion is not a crime, by the way. ... You have to show a conspiracy to hack [the Democratic National Committee]. ... They don't have any evidence of that — which is the reason they don't submit a report, because they are embarrassed. ... So, I am challenging

Russia-related investigations." The Daily Caller said "neither Strzok nor Page identified the source, but only three individuals, former British spy Christopher Steele, former Australian diplomat Alexander Downer and former Cambridge professor Stefan Halper, have been publidy identified as sources for the FBI in th

three individuals, former British spy Christopher Steele, former Australian diplomat Alexander Downer and

ollusion with Russia that occurred during the 2016 campaign. Trump wrote, "The only Collusion with the Russians was with Crooked Hillary Clinton and the Democratic National Committee...And, where's the Server that the DNC refused to give to the FBI? Where are the new Texts between Agent Lisa Page and her Agent lover, Peter S? We

ompany (founded by former journalists, it provided information to private clients), had been retained by Democratic Party interests. Fusion had hired Christopher Steele, a former British spy, in June 2016, to help investigate Trump’s repeated brags about his relationship with Vladimir Putin and the nature of Trump’s

nature of Trump’s relationship with the Kremlin. With reports from Russian sources, many HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019911 connected to Russian intelligence, Steele assembled a damaging report—now dubbed the “dossier’—suggesting that Donald Trump was being blackmailed by the Putin government. In September, Steele

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_019960 Theory 3: The Holy Grail proposition was that Trump and the Russians—perhaps even Putin himself—had gotten together to hack the Democratic National Committee. Theory 4: But then there was the those-that-know-him-best theory, some version of which most Trumpers would come to embrace. He was just star-fucki

orcing the notion that it was initiated “for the purpose” of affecting the presidential election. The chief evidence of collusion is the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s servers. But nothing in the public record suggests the Trump campaign aided that effort. The collusion narrative therefore hinges on the more generic

ssia collusion narrative. Shortly after Crossfire’s launch, CIA Director John Brennan and Mr. Comey briefed Congress, triggering predictable leaking. Christopher Steele and his patrons embarked on a media roadshow, making their dossier something of an open secret in Washington. On Aug. 29, 2016, the New York Times

orcing the notion that it was initiated “for the purpose” of affecting the presidential election. The chief evidence of collusion is the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s servers. But nothing in the public record suggests the Trump campaign aided that effort. The collusion narrative therefore hinges on the more generic

ssia collusion narrative. Shortly after Crossfire’s launch, CIA Director John Brennan and Mr. Comey briefed Congress, triggering predictable leaking. Christopher Steele and his patrons embarked on a media roadshow, making their dossier something of an open secret in Washington. On Aug. 29, 2016, the New York Times

orcing the notion that it was initiated “for the purpose” of affecting the presidential election. The chief evidence of collusion is the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s servers. But nothing in the public record suggests the Trump campaign aided that effort. The collusion narrative therefore hinges on the more generic

ssia collusion narrative. Shortly after Crossfire’s launch, CIA Director John Brennan and Mr. Comey briefed Congress, triggering predictable leaking. Christopher Steele and his patrons embarked on a media roadshow, making their dossier something of an open secret in Washington. On Aug. 29, 2016, the New York Times

orcing the notion that it was initiated “for the purpose” of affecting the presidential election. The chief evidence of collusion is the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s servers. But nothing in the public record suggests the Trump campaign aided that effort. The collusion narrative therefore hinges on the more generic

ssia collusion narrative. Shortly after Crossfire’s launch, CIA Director John Brennan and Mr. Comey briefed Congress, triggering predictable leaking. Christopher Steele and his patrons embarked on a media roadshow, making their dossier something of an open secret in Washington. On Aug. 29, 2016, the New York Times

orcing the notion that it was initiated “for the purpose” of affecting the presidential election. The chief evidence of collusion is the hacking of the Democratic National Committee’s servers. But nothing in the public record suggests the Trump campaign aided that effort. The collusion narrative therefore hinges on the more generic

ssia collusion narrative. Shortly after Crossfire’s launch, CIA Director John Brennan and Mr. Comey briefed Congress, triggering predictable leaking. Christopher Steele and his patrons embarked on a media roadshow, making their dossier something of an open secret in Washington. On Aug. 29, 2016, the New York Times