Epstein Secrets

4 Selection and the Descent of Man (Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co., 1972), p. 139. 'E.O. Wilson, Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1975). Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976). ‘John Cacioppo, “Loneliness: Conceptualization,” (In press), pp.

results of each catch. After extensive sampling, the scientist concluded that there were no fish smaller than two inches in the sea. The moral of Sir Eddington's analogy is twofold. First, scientific instruments are shaped by people’s intuitive theories of the phenomena to be investigated. Second, once devel

|29 Epley N, Waytz A, Akalis S, Cacioppo JT. When we need a human: Motivational determinants of anthropomorphism. Social Cognition 2008;26:143-55. Eddington AS. The philosophy of physical science : Tarner lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1939. Rilling J, Gutman D, Zeh T, Pagnoni G, Berns

p. 390 aceThe thing said . . . a common source.fi A A n Shakespeare, aceA world full. . . signifying nothing" A A 28. E. E. Cummings, / (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1969), p. 69. in any number of . . . ficepastA ficepresentA or ficefuture" A A 29. Hulme, Speculations, p. 221. ficeit is impossible . . . the sym

ew York: Harcourt, Brace & Co., 1949), p. 4. AceValue is in activity" A A s..s Brillouin, op. cit., p. 100. aceOnly the final sum matters" A A 65. Eddington, op. cit., p. 142. AcePhysical science consists . . . impenetrable mathematical symbol" A A 0_6_, Stevens, aceThe Man with the Blue Guitar,' in Coll

election and the Descent of Man (Chicago: Aldine Publishing Co., 1972), p. 139. I.E.O. Wilson, Sociobiology: The New Synthesis (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1975). "Richard Dawkins, The Selfish Gene (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1976). "John Cacioppo, "Loneliness: Conceptualization," (In press),

ults of each catch. After extensive sampling, the scientist concluded that there were no fish smaller than two inches in the sea. The moral of Sir Eddington's analogy is twofold. First, scientific instruments are shaped by people's intuitive theories of the phenomena to be investigated. Second, once d