Epstein Secrets

t none of these cases - United States v. 10 104 Turner, !9? Searcy v. Paletz, !°3 or Searcy v. Skinner -

the district court in the Does case also rejected Government efforts to dismiss the action. The district court

ions.'°! Yet none of these cases—United States v. Turner,'°? Searcy v. Paletz,'® or Searcy v. Skinner'°*—p

sonable right to confer with the attorney for the Government.” At least in the posture of this case (and we do

rged conduct under the CVRA. See United States v. Turner, 367 F. Supp. 2d 319, 327 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (conclu

dings," *° to "confer with [the] attorney for the Government n 4l in the case, and to attend court proceedin

heard orally at sentencing), and United States v. Turner, 367 F. Supp. 2d 319, 333 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (noting

overning information subject to disclosure by the Government in criminal cases, nor any other federal rule or