Epstein Secrets

heard orally at sentencing), and United States v. Turner, 367 F. Supp. 2d 319, 333 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (noting

8 See generally Beloof, Cassell & Twist, supra note 6, at 392-99 (reviewing caselaw on the victim's interest in venue decisions). 379-737 A.2d 55 (N.J. 1999), cert. denied, 534 U.S. 858 (2001). 380 Id. at 64-69. DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017681 --- PAGE BREAK --- Page 47 of 78 2007 Utah L. Re

ions.'°! Yet none of these cases—United States v. Turner,'°? Searcy v. Paletz,'® or Searcy v. Skinner'°*—p

heard at any hearing involving a plea. See id. § 24-4.1-302.5. 236 Mo. ANN. STAT. § 595.209(10) (West 2011). 237 OFFICE OF VICTIM-WITNESS ADvocacy, N.J. DEP’T of LAW & Pup. SAFETY, A CRIME VICTIM’S GUIDE TO THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM 4 (2d ed. 1997), see also N.J. Const. art. I, § 22. Compare 18 U.S.

rged conduct under the CVRA. See United States v. Turner, 367 F. Supp. 2d 319, 327 (E.D.N.Y. 2005) (conclu

right to change venue because it "is, in effect, to accord the defense a whole peremptory challenge against the entire community"). 212 737 A.2d 55 (N.J. 1999). DAVID SCHOEN HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017742 --- PAGE BREAK --- Page 29 of 52 2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *884 account does not constitute error, prov