3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 7
Mentions
tics. Flmtana/Collins, 1977. Orig. published 1916 as "emirs de linguistique generale". EBJ+97. J. Elman, E. Bates, M. Johnson, A. Karmiloff-Smith, D. Parisi. and K. Plunkett. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. MIT Press, 1997. Ede93. Gerald Edelman. Neural darwinism: Sel
r the latter are learned via MOSES or via some other means. The textual realization of Combo resembles LISP with less syntactic sugar. Internally a Combo program is represented as a program tree. • Composer: In the PLN design, a rule is denoted a composer if it needs premises for generating its conse
ve its fingers to pick up a cup, coordinating its movements with its visual perceptions. It's certainly possible to represent this sort of thing in Combo, but Combo may be an awkward tool. However, if one represents low-level procedures like this using another method, e.g. learned cell assemblies in a
the question of programs in what programming language, and in this context we have made a fairly traditional choice, using a special language called Combo that is essentially a minor variant of LISP, and supplying Combo with a set of customized primitives intended to reduce the length of the typical p
eelenwegens. Eine neuronale Theorie der Handfungsregula- tion. Verlag Hans Huber, 2002. EBJ+97. J. Elman, E. Bates, M. Johnson, A. Karmiloff-Smith, D. Parisi, and K. Plunkett. Rethinking Innateness: A Connection-jai Perspective on Development. MIT Press, 1997. EFTA00624120 References 345 Ede93. Gera
r the latter are learned via MOSES or via some other means. The textual realization of Combo resembles LISP with less syntactic sugar. Internally a Combo program is represented as a program tree. • Composer: In the PLN design, a rule is denoted a composer if it needs premises for generating its conse
p the rules might profitably be ported into the Atomspace as ImplicationLinks. • Representation Building: A stage within MOSES, wherein a candidate Combo program tree (within a deme) is modified by replacing one or more tree nodes with alternative tree nodes, thus obtaining a new, different candidate
ntk des Seelenwagens. Eine neuronale Theorie der Handlungsregula- tion. Verlag Hans Huber, 2002. J. Elman, E. Bates, M. Johnson, A. Karmiloff-Smith, D. Parisi, and K. Plunkett. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. MIT Press, 1997. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013260 References 345 Ede93.
d up the rules might profitably be ported into the Atomspace as ImplicationLinks. Representation Building: A stage within MOSES, wherein a candidate Combo program tree (within a deme) is modified by replacing one or more tree nodes with alternative tree nodes, thus obtaining a new, different candidate p
her the latter are learned via MOSES or via some other means. The textual realization of Combo resembles LISP with less syntactic sugar. Internally a Combo program is represented as a program tree. e Composer: In the PLN design, a rule is denoted a composer if it needs premises for generating its conseq
Entities connected to both D. Parisi and Combo

Marc Rich
PERSONPredicateNode
LOCATIONPredicateNodes
ORGANIZATIONConceptNodes
ORGANIZATIONMindAgents
PERSONOpenCog
ORGANIZATIONthe Webmind AI Engine
ORGANIZATIONImplicationLinks
ORGANIZATION
Marvin Minsky
PERSONTruthValues
ORGANIZATIONDeSTIN
ORGANIZATIONCogPrime
ORGANIZATIONScheduler
ORGANIZATIONFrameNet
ORGANIZATIONCassio Pennachin
PERSONNil Geisweiller
PERSONVariableAtoms
ORGANIZATIONArtificial General Intelligence
ORGANIZATION
George W. Bush
PERSONPei Wang
PERSON