Epstein Secrets

insic in the PLN component of CogPrime, but in-principle capability is not the same as pragmatic, grounded, controllable capability. Very early on, Vygotsky Nyg861 disagreed with Piaget's explanation of his stages as inherent and developed by the child's own activities, and Piaget's prescription of good

ive development of humans and human-like AGI systems, but in Table 11.1 we present them in a slightly more general context, using two examples: the Piagetan example of the human (or humanlike) mind as it develops from infancy to maturity; and also the example of the "origin of life" and the development

refining inference control. EFTA00623977 202 11 Stages of Cognitive Development A problem commonly used to illustrate the difference between the Piagetan concrete opera- tional and formal stages is that of figuring out the rules for making pendulums swing quickly versus slowly pins'. If you ask a chil

be for AGI to be able to translate it directly into architectural principles and requirements. As noted above, while early thinkers like Piaget and Vygotsky outlined systematic theories of child cognitive development, these are no longer considered fully accurate, and one currently faces a mass of detail

vironment, without requiring anywhere near a complete simulation of realistic physics. EFTA00624075 300 16 AC1 Preschool Fig. 16.1: Part 1 of a Piagetan conservation of volume experiment: a child observes that two glasses obviously have the same amount of milk in them, and then sees the content of on

, etc. And, as typical, not necessarily representative examples of tasks psychologists use to mea- sure cognitive development (drawn mainly from the Piagetan tradition, without implying any assertion that this is the only tradition worth pursuing), consider the following: 1. Which row has more circles- A

rinsic in the PLN component of CogPrime, but in-principle capability is not the same as pragmatic, grounded, controllable capability. Very early on, Vygotsky [Vyg86] disagreed with Piaget’s explanation of his stages as inherent and developed by the child’s own activities, and Piaget’s prescription of good

itive development of humans and human-like AGI systems, but in Table 11.1 we present them in a slightly more general context, using two examples: the Piagetan example of the human (or humanlike) mind as it develops from infancy to maturity; and also the example of the “origin of life’ and the development of

inference control. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013117 202 11 Stages of Cognitive Development A problem commonly used to illustrate the difference between the Piagetan concrete opera- tional and formal stages is that of figuring out the rules for making pendulums swing quickly versus slowly [P58]. If you ask a child

o be for AGI to be able to translate it directly into architectural principles and requirements. As noted above, while early thinkers like Piaget and Vygotsky outlined systematic theories of child cognitive development, these are no longer considered fully accurate, and one currently faces a mass of detaile

, etc. And, as typical, not necessarily representative examples of tasks psychologists use to mea- sure cognitive development (drawn mainly from the Piagetan tradition, without implying any assertion that this is the only tradition worth pursuing), consider the following: 1. Which row has more circles- A

nt, without requiring anywhere near a complete simulation of realistic physics. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013215 300 16 AGI Preschool Fig. 16.1: Part 1 of a Piagetan conservation of volume experiment: a child observes that two glasses obviously have the same amount of milk in them, and then sees the content of one