Epstein Secrets

t: Re: Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2018 16:33:27 +0000 What do you think of as space/field effects? The universe or learning? Btw., did you ever come across Schmidhuber's idea of a Goedel lachine? > On Mar 9, 2018, at 05:39, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: > I would think of it more of a space / field eff

g purpose, instead of from the bottom, subverting attention, we might be more successful. (Downside might be that we create cults.) > Of the bunch, Hyman managed to be the most interesting (Kahneman was very charismatic but mostly tried to see if he could identify an application for his system one/sys

r 9, 2018 at 5:33 PM, Joscha Bach < > wrote: What do you think of as space/field effects? The universe or learning? Btw., did you ever come across Schmidhuber's idea of a Goedel Machine? > On Mar 9, 2018, at 05:39, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: > I would think of it more of a space / field eff

g purpose, instead of from the bottom, subverting attention, we might be more successful. (Downside might be that we create cults.) > Of the bunch, Hyman managed to be the most interesting (Kahneman was very charismatic but mostly tried to see if he could identify an application for his system one/sys

2018 at 5:33 PM, Joscha Bach < > =rote: > What do you think of as space/field effects? The universe or learning? > Btw., did you ever come across Schmidhuber's idea of a Goedel Machine? > On Mar 9, 2018, at 05:39, jeffrey E. <[email protected]> wrote: > > » I would think of it more of a space / fiel

ting purpose, instead of =rom the bottom, subverting attention, we might be more successful. =Downside might be that we create cults.) Of the bunch, Hyman managed to be the most interesting (Kahneman was =ery charismatic but mostly tried to see if he could identify an =pplication for his system one/sys

Mar 9, 2018 at 5:33 PM,=Joscha Bach > wrote: What do you think of as space/field effects? The univ=rse or earning. Btw., did you ever come across Schmidhuber's idea of a Goedel Machine?<=r> > On Mar 9, 2018, at 05:39, jeffrey E. <[email protected] <mailto:jeevacation=gmail.com» wrote: > I would think

ting purpose, instead of from the bottom, subverting attention, we m=ght be more successful. (Downside might be that we create cults.) Of the bunch, Hyman managed to be the most interesting (Kahneman was v=ry charismatic but mostly tried to see if he could identify an application=for his system one/sys