Epstein Secrets

ve occurred to you. Aside from many factual errors in your letter, which I won't review, I'm also amazed, and shocked, to read such statements as "Carol's intention to leave some money to your children." Carol's intention? Alone? Not my intention? Is this your conception of what our family life was?

of your letter is Max's interpretation, which is flatly false, and surely ridiculous. We never thought of the crazy idea of setting up two separate Trusts, one to manage my "individual property," and the other for M to manage her "individual property." It amazes me that this idea could even occur to y

for the survivor. Seizing on this technicality, Max contrived a story about our dividing up our resources, with me responsible for my portion, and Carol responsible for her portion and for the children. This mad idea of course never occurred either to us, or to Eric. 2 EFTA_R1_01631179 EFTA02502742

of your letter is Max's interpretation, which is fla=ly false, and surely ridiculous. We never thought of the crazy idea of setting up two separate Trusts, one to manage my "individual property," and the other for M to manage her "individual property." It amazes me that this idea could even occur to yo

ave occurred to you. Aside from many factual errors in your letter, whic= I won't review, I'm also amazed, and shocked, to read such statemen=s as "Carol's intention to leave some money to your children." Car=l's intention? Alone? Not my intention? Is this your concepti=n of what our family life was?

of your letter is Max's inte=pretation, which is flatly false, and surely ridiculous. We never thought of the crazy idea of setting up two separate Trusts, one to manage my "in=ividual property," and the other for M to manage her "individual property." It amazes me that this idea could even occur to yo

ur new lawyer recommended to stop =hese payments immediately. I asked No=m and he is confirming that all the Trusts, even the ones established unde= Carol's name were funded with his money. </=iv> The girls have jobs, but according to Noam, they don&#=9;t make enough from their jobs. But they live ve

re. An= considering all our situation, our new lawyer recommended to stop =hese payments immediately. I asked No=m and he is confirming that all the Trusts, even the ones established unde= Carol's name were funded with his money. </=iv> The girls have jobs, but according to Noam, they don&#=9;t make e

lawyer recommended to stop these payments immediately. <=iv> I asked Noam and he is confirming that all the Trusts, e=en the ones established under Carol's name were funded with his money.=/div> The girls have jobs, but according to Noam, they =on't make enough from their jobs. But they live very co

considering all our situation, o=r new lawyer recommended to stop these payments immediately. <=iv> I asked Noam and he is confirming that all the Trusts, e=en the ones established under Carol's name were funded with his money.=/div> The girls have jobs, but according to Noam, they =on't make enough

ria C=omsky <mailto > wrote: The =oney for the Trusts for them came totally from Noam,according to Noam, alt=ough some Trusts were established in Carol's name. Noam also pro=ided them the homes they own and live, in addition to the Lexington house =nd the Wellfleet house. <=iv> Forwarded message

o they depend on Noam for money ? Do they ha=e families? <=1" On Sun, Jul 2, 2017 at 1:36 PM Valeria C=omsky <mailto > wrote: The =oney for the Trusts for them came totally from Noam,according to Noam, alt=ough some Trusts were established in Carol's name. Noam also pro=ided them the homes they own

have occurred to you. Aside from many factual errors along the w=y, which I won't review, I'm also amazed, and shocked, to read suc= statements as "Carol's intention to leave some money to your chi=dren." Carol's intention? Alone? Not my intention?Q Is this your conception of what our family life was

of your letter is Max's interpretation, which=is flatly false, and surely ridiculous. We never thought of the craz= idea of setting up two separate Trusts, one to manage my "individual=property,"and the other to for M to manage her "individual prope=ty." We had property jointly, not divided into mine a