3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
3 / 7
Mentions
Perspective on Development. MIT Press, 1997. Ede93. Gerald Edelman. Neural darwinism: Selection and reentrant signaling in higher brain function. Neuron, 10, 1993. PF92. Christian Freksa and Robert Milton. Temporal reasoning based on semi-intervals. Artificial Intel- ligence, 54(1-2):199 - 227, 1992
r the latter are learned via MOSES or via some other means. The textual realization of Combo resembles LISP with less syntactic sugar. Internally a Combo program is represented as a program tree. • Composer: In the PLN design, a rule is denoted a composer if it needs premises for generating its conse
ve its fingers to pick up a cup, coordinating its movements with its visual perceptions. It's certainly possible to represent this sort of thing in Combo, but Combo may be an awkward tool. However, if one represents low-level procedures like this using another method, e.g. learned cell assemblies in a
the question of programs in what programming language, and in this context we have made a fairly traditional choice, using a special language called Combo that is essentially a minor variant of LISP, and supplying Combo with a set of customized primitives intended to reduce the length of the typical p
Press, 1997. EFTA00624120 References 345 Ede93. Gerald Edelman. Neural darwinism: Selection and reentrant signaling in higher brain function. Neuron, 10, 1993. Elm91. J. Elman. Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Machine Learning, 7:195-226, 1991.
r the latter are learned via MOSES or via some other means. The textual realization of Combo resembles LISP with less syntactic sugar. Internally a Combo program is represented as a program tree. • Composer: In the PLN design, a rule is denoted a composer if it needs premises for generating its conse
p the rules might profitably be ported into the Atomspace as ImplicationLinks. • Representation Building: A stage within MOSES, wherein a candidate Combo program tree (within a deme) is modified by replacing one or more tree nodes with alternative tree nodes, thus obtaining a new, different candidate
, 1997. HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013260 References 345 Ede93. Gerald Edelman. Neural darwinism: Selection and reentrant signaling in higher brain function. Neuron, 10, 1993. Elm91. J. Elman. Distributed representations, simple recurrent networks, and grammatical structure. Machine Learning, 7:195-226, 1991. E
d up the rules might profitably be ported into the Atomspace as ImplicationLinks. Representation Building: A stage within MOSES, wherein a candidate Combo program tree (within a deme) is modified by replacing one or more tree nodes with alternative tree nodes, thus obtaining a new, different candidate p
her the latter are learned via MOSES or via some other means. The textual realization of Combo resembles LISP with less syntactic sugar. Internally a Combo program is represented as a program tree. e Composer: In the PLN design, a rule is denoted a composer if it needs premises for generating its conseq
Entities connected to both Neuron and Combo

Julie K. Brown
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Vicky Ward
PERSON
Harvard University
ORGANIZATIONComplex Systems
ORGANIZATION
Princeton University
ORGANIZATION
Phoenix
LOCATIONMindAgents
PERSONIndiana University
ORGANIZATIONPlenum Press
ORGANIZATIONPredicateNodes
ORGANIZATIONConceptNodes
ORGANIZATIONPredicateNode
LOCATIONOpenCog
ORGANIZATION
George W. Bush
PERSONDeSTIN
ORGANIZATION
MIT Press
ORGANIZATIONCogPrime
ORGANIZATION
Marvin Minsky
PERSONImplicationLinks
ORGANIZATION