Epstein Secrets

would be unreasonable, and would therefore violate the Constitution. Epstein asserts his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination. See DeLisi v. Bankers Ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy v. Hogan 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Cl

been furnished by ckf- AA U.S. Mail to all Counsel on the attached list, this l , 20a. Jac a ar No.: 169440 Sear Denney Scarola Barnhart 7 2 Shipley, P.A. 1, '139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard est Palm Beach Fax: (561) 383-9451 Attorney for Defendant, Bradley J. Edwards 2 EFTA00722480 Case No

Fifth Amendment Privilege against self-incrimination to the allegations set forth in paragraphs 23 through 27 of the Second Amended Complaint. See DeLisi I Bankers ins. Company, 436 So.2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983); Malloy I Hogan, 84 S.Ct. 1489, 1495 (1964)(the Fifth Amendment's Self-Incrimination Cla

(See above for address) LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Consol Plaintiff represented by Jack Patrick Hill Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard PO Drawer 3626 , FL 33402-3626 Fax: 22/11.... Email: LEAD ATTORNEY ATTORNEY TO BE NOTICED Richard Horace Will

oid giving discovery, using the fifth amendment as both a ‘sword and a shield.” DePalma v. DePalma, 538 So. 2d 1290, 1290 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)(quoting DeLisi v. Bankers Insurance Co., 436 So. 2d 1099 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)). Put another way, “[a] civil litigant’s fifth amendment right to avoid self-incriminat

ake the: deposition of Tommy Mattola. That assertion is untrue. Mr. Mattola's deposition was set by the law firm of Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart and Shipley. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit ““N” at 16. 74. Edwards gave notice that he intended to take David Copperfield's deposition. Edwards possessed a leg