Epstein Secrets

this Court's verbal ruling on March 8, 2018, asserting that Epstein was prohibited from referring, in any way, to the 27,000+ pages contained on the Fowler White CD. His claim is that Epstein violated this Court's ruling the four times Epstein "referenced" the documents at issue in one filing with this

dwards, 4'h DCA Case No. 4D18-0787. (Composite Exhibit C.) CONCLUSION Epstein's general references in pre-trial filings with this Court and in the Fourth District Court of Appeal to the 47 exhibits in question are fully compliant with the Court's rulings at the March 8, 2018 hearing. Epstein has not dissemina

Work on Response in Opposition to B. Edwards' 9.50 7,125.00 Motion to be Permitted to Take His Limited Deposition; review Order to Show Cause Why Fowler White and J. Epstein Should Not be Held in Contempt and Scheduling Evidentiary Show Cause Hearing; telephone conferences with D. Indyke and C. Pu

. Rockenbach to have in the pipeline, pending outcome of 3/8/18 hearing; review appellate rules of procedure on certiorari and mandamus relief and Fourth District Court of Appeal's Administrative Order re requests for emergency relief 03/04/18 SJL Work on strategies re case not at issues, Petition for Cert

er issues surrounding the 27,000 page disc of e-mails located in Fowler White's files; follow up with client on outcome of hearing; follow up with Fowler White re issues surrounding disc; work on Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus and Emergency Motion for Review of Order Denying Stay 03/08/18 K

e all r. 90.702, work-product pr inethical behavior, is; onse in Opposition to Pr eider from the Fourth Di P. Cassell's Pro Hac Vi. ) the Fourth District Cc Ida+ for panel purposes 03/17/18 TLC Cr c, ionology of Ix i, .; review court filings, tr; r re same 03/17/18 SJL C( ) I Edwards' Resp