Epstein Secrets

ublished Affirmed conviction in earlier case but remanded regarding resentencing because court applied sentencing guidelines as optional. U.S. I Jenkins, 163 Fed. Appx. 578 (9th Cir. 2006) Unpublished Internet No information available. Pled guilty to 2422(b) and 2423(b). Appealed 46 month senten

& obtained phone records. Ellitspiracy to engage in illicit sexual conduct in foreign places in violation of 18 U.S.0 § 2423(e). Defendant seeks Jencks Act material prior to witness testifying. 2422(b); 2423 Consummated *Conspiracy 2423(e) 76 EFTA00224210 COURT CASES tati:s: ,11INIF.! , -..

29520 •-• , - .., ;.'.0 51TO . .--,. ...-,. ,. • •;CASES ;'' .'• ,•:11A,6ILI Y ,*AerS/e0IVISTIEW.01.11p1* ' . . etfABOa - ,. ,. U.S. v. Jenkins, 163 Fed. Appx. 578 (9''' Cir. 2006) Unpublished No Information No information available. Pled guilty to 2422(b) and 2423(b). Appealed 46 mon

* conspiracy Conspiracy to engage in illicit sexual conduct in foreign places in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(e). *Conspiracy Defendant seeks Jencks Act material prior to witness testifying. 2423(e) • U.S. v. Rosenberg, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19160 (ED. Pa. 2004) Internet 58 yr-old computer ins

. . . Enlint - .• CQ 1 1' IC ': ,,•,`• .„ 1 1 . PPit::4 %;•i“4 tr:- , _, clIARGE 7 „I .14...-:', .W4N;)1);' ' tv: l: -:. U.S. v. Jenkins, 163 Fed. Appx. 578 (9'h Cir. 2006) Unpublished No Information No information available. Pled guilty to 2422(b) and 2423(b). Appealed 46 month

& obtained phone records. Conspiracy to engage in illicit sexual conduct in foreign places in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2423(e). Defendant seeks Jencks Act material prior to witness testifying. 2422(6); 2423 Consummated *Conspiracy 2423(e) U.S. v. Rosenberg, 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19160 (E.D. Pa.

ed States v. Jackman, 46 F.3d 1240 (2d Cir. 1995) 300, 301 United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682 (8th Cir. 2005) 33,37,38,46 United States v. Jenkins, 727 F. App'x 732 (2d Cir. 2018) 194 United States v. Jennings, 960 F.2d 1488 (9th Cir. 1992) 162 United States v. Jimenez, 824 F. Supp. 351

Particulars Is Not Warranted 174 1. Applicable Law 174 2. Discussion 178 B. The Defendant's Requests for Early Production of a Witness List and Jencks Act Material Should Be Denied 182 1. Applicable Law 182 2. Discussion 184 C. The Defendant's Additional Requests for Disclosure Should Be Denied

States v. Jackman, 46 F.3d 1240 (2d Cir. 1995) 300, 301 United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682 (8th Cir. 2005) 33, 37, 38, 46 United States v. Jenkins, 727 F. App'x 732 (2d Cir. 2018) 194 United States v. Jennings, 960 F.2d 1488 (9th Cir. 1992) 162 United States v. Jimenez, 824 F. Supp. 351 (

Particulars Is Not Warranted 174 1. Applicable Law 174 2. Discussion 178 B. The Defendant's Requests for Early Production of a Witness List and Jencks Act Material Should Be Denied 182 1. Applicable Law 182 2. Discussion 184 C. The Defendant's Additional Requests for Disclosure Should Be Denied

States v. Jackman, 46 F.3d 1240 (2d Cir. 1995) 300, 301 United States v. Jeffries, 405 F.3d 682 (8th Cir. 2005) 33, 37, 38, 46 United States v. Jenkins, 727 F. App'x 732 (2d Cir. 2018) 194 United States v. Jennings, 960 F.2d 1488 (9th Cir. 1992) 162 United States v. Jimenez, 824 F. Supp. 351 (

Particulars Is Not Warranted 174 1. Applicable Law 174 2. Discussion 178 B. The Defendant's Requests for Early Production of a Witness List and Jencks Act Material Should Be Denied 182 1. Applicable Law 182 2. Discussion 184 C. The Defendant's Additional Requests for Disclosure Should Be Denied

ited States v. lannelli, 461 F.2d 483 (2d Cir. 1972) 44 United States v. Jqffries, 405 F.3d 682 (8th Cir. 2005) 26, 28, 29, 34 United States v. Jenkins, 727 F. App'x 732 (2d Cir. 2018) 130 xiv EFTA00095081 United States v. Jennings, 960 F.2d 1488 (9th Cir. 1992) 110 United States v. Jimenez,

Particulars Is Not Warranted 173 1. Applicable Law 174 2. Discussion 177 A. The Defendant's Requests for Early Production of a Witness List and Jencks Act Material Should Be Denied 182 1. Applicable Law 182 2. Discussion 183 A. The Defendant's Additional Requests for Disclosure Should Be Denied

understanding by a questioner and answerer," it is not fundamentally ambiguous. Id. at 375 (internal quotation marks omitted); see United States v. Jenkins, 727 F. App'x 732, 735 (2d Cir. 2018) ("An individual of ordinary 130 EFTA00095222 intelligence would not think that a question asking for inform

, extensive discovery, and various pretrial filings, including this memorandum. The defendant will also receive trial exhibits, a witness list, and Jencks Act material reasonably in advance of trial. As such, she has not established an entitlement to a bill of particulars under well-established governing l

States v. Jackman, 46 F.3d 1240 (2d Cir. 1995) 300, 301 United States v. Jqffries, 405 F.3d 682 (8th Cir. 2005) 33, 37, 38, 46 United States v. Jenkins, 727 F. App'x 732 (2d Cir. 2018) 194 United States v. Jennings, 960 F.2d 1488 (9th Cir. 1992) 162 United States v. Jimenez, 824 F. Supp. 351

rticulars Is Not Warranted 174 1. Applicable Law 174 2. Discussion 178 B. The Defendant's Requests for Early Production of a Witness List and Jencks Act Material Should Be Denied 182 1. Applicable Law 182 2. Discussion 184 C. The Defendant's Additional Requests for Disclosure Should Be Denied