4
Shared Docs
4
Same-Page
4 / 10
Mentions
ea; this concept is present. for instance, in the 19th-century philosophy of Charles Peirce IPei:341, in the writings of contempo- rary philosophers Daniel Dennett [Den91J and Douglas Hofstadter 1110179, I lo1961, in Benjamin Whorl's tj linguistic philosophy and Gregory Bateson's lam 79] systems theory of mind
g used as the basis for an open-source software project called OpenCog, which is being worked on by software developers around the world. Right now OpenCog embodies only a percentage of the overall CogPrime design as described here. But if OpenCog continues to attract sufficient funding or volunteer in
the ideas presented here are not mere armchair speculation - they are currently being used as the basis for an open-source software project called OpenCog, which is being worked on by software developers around the world. Right now OpenCog embodies only a percentage of the overall CogPrime design as d
validated or refuted via practice. (As a related note: here and there in this book, we will refer to the "current" CogPrime implementation (in the OpenCog framework); in all cases this refers to OpenCog as of late 2013.) To state one believes one knows a workable path to creating a human-level (and po
idea; this concept is present, for instance, in the 19th-century philosophy of Charles Peirce [Pei34], in the writings of contempo- rary philosophers Daniel Dennett [Den91] and Douglas Hofstadter [Hof79, Hof96], in Benjamin Whorf’s [Who64] linguistic philosophy and Gregory Bateson’s [Bat79] systems theory of mind
ing used as the basis for an open-source software project called OpenCog, which is being worked on by software developers around the world. Right now OpenCog embodies only a percentage of the overall CogPrime design as described here. But if OpenCog continues to attract sufficient funding or volunteer inte
at the ideas presented here are not mere armchair speculation — they are currently being used as the basis for an open-source software project called OpenCog, which is being worked on by software developers around the world. Right now OpenCog embodies only a percentage of the overall CogPrime design as des
be validated or refuted via practice. (As a related note: here and there in this book, we will refer to the "current" CogPrime implementation (in the OpenCog framework); in all cases this refers to OpenCog as of late 2013.) To state one believes one knows a workable path to creating a human-level (and pot
biological systems. Biological Cybernetics, 87, 392-403,2002. Den87. D. Dennett. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987. Den91. Daniel Dennett. Consciousness Explained. Back Bay, 1991. DC05. Hugo De Cans. The Artifact War. ETC, 2005. DOP08. Wlodzislaw Duch, Richard Oentaryo, and Michel P
zed Terms • Abduction: A general form of inference that goes from data describing something to a hypothesis that accounts for the data. Often in an OpenCog context, this refers to the PLN abduction rule, a specific First-Order PLN rule (If A implies C, and B implies C, then maybe A is B), which embodie
bility. EFTA00624100 Appendix A Glossary A.1 List of Specialized Acronyms This includes acronyms that are commonly used in discussing CogPrime, OpenCog and related ideas, plus sonic that occur here and there in the text for relatively ephemeral reasons. • AA: Attention Allocation • ADF: Automatica
ic plasticity in biological systems. Biological Cybernetics, 87, 392-403, 2002. D. Dennett. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987. Daniel Dennett. Consciousness Explained. Back Bay, 1991. Hugo De Garis. The Artilect War. ETC, 2005. Wlodzislaw Duch, Richard Oentaryo, and Michel Pasquier. Cogni
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013240 Appendix A Glossary A.1 List of Specialized Acronyms This includes acronyms that are commonly used in discussing CogPrime, OpenCog and related ideas, plus some that occur here and there in the text for relatively ephemeral reasons. AA: Attention Allocation ADF: Automatically De
alized Terms Abduction: A general form of inference that goes from data describing something to a hypothesis that accounts for the data. Often in an OpenCog context, this refers to the PLN abduction rule, a specific First-Order PLN rule (If A implies C, and B implies C, then maybe A is B), which embodies
Entities connected to both Daniel Dennett and OpenCog

Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON
Ben Goertzel
PERSON
Stephen Hawking
PERSON
Joscha Bach
PERSON
George W. Bush
PERSON
Marc Rich
PERSON
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON
Lesley Groff
PERSON
Prince Andrew
PERSON
Marvin Minsky
PERSON
Prince Charles
PERSON
Michael Douglas
PERSONNovamente LLC
ORGANIZATION
Earth
LOCATION
Jared Kushner
PERSON
Xiamen
LOCATION
George Church
PERSON
Lawrence Krauss
PERSONDeSTIN
ORGANIZATION
Sergey Brin
PERSON