Epstein Secrets

on a series of actions each of which might have been motivated by a variety of ends or no ends at all."' (Def. Mot. at 11 (quoting United States v. Burns, No. 07 Cr. 556, 2009 WL 3617448, at *5 (N.D. III. Oct. 27, 2009)).5 There is nothing prejudicial or simple about Dr. testimony. The jury will not

he "jury will not be unduly prejudiced against [the defendant] if the government refers to certain witnesses as victims"); (citing United States v. Washburn, 444 F.3d 1007, 1013 (8th Cir. 2006) ("[A] number of courts have determined that the use of the term "victim" in jury instructions is not prejudicia

dge University Press, 2001), pp. 1-2. 20Aquinas, Summa Theologica, III, "Supplement," q., 41.1. 21Thomas Aquinas, Summa Contra Gentiles (London: Burns, Oates, and Washburn, 1928), 3, ii, p. 115. 22Aristotic, Politics, Richard McKeon (ed.) The Basic Works of Aristotle (New York: Random House, 194

ss, 2001), pp. 1-2. 20Aquinas, Summa Theologica, III, "Supplement," q., 41.1. 21Thomas Aquinas, Summa Contra Gentiles (London: Burns, Oates, and Washburn, 1928), 3, ii, p. 115. 22Aristotic, Politics, Richard McKeon (ed.) The Basic Works of Aristotle (New York: Random House, 1941), I, i. "Plato, The

Cambridge University Press, 2001), pp. 1-2. Aquinas, Summa Theologica, II, “Supplement,” q., 41.1. *IThomas Aquinas, Summa Contra Gentiles (London: Burns, Oates, and Washburn, 1928), 3, ii, p. 115. ” Aristotle, Politics, Richard McKeon (ed.) The Basic Works of Aristotle (New York: Random House, 1941),

ty Press, 2001), pp. 1-2. Aquinas, Summa Theologica, II, “Supplement,” q., 41.1. *IThomas Aquinas, Summa Contra Gentiles (London: Burns, Oates, and Washburn, 1928), 3, ii, p. 115. ” Aristotle, Politics, Richard McKeon (ed.) The Basic Works of Aristotle (New York: Random House, 1941), I, i. Plato, The Re