Epstein Secrets

m Horowitz Bradley J. Edwards Epstein Matter — Cross Notice of Alfredo Rodriguez Deposition Joint-privilege 02209-02210 07/01/2009 Bert Patton William J. Berger Epstein v. State of Florida — Emergency petition for Writ of Certiorari; Emergency motion to review denial of stay Joint-privilege 02215-02217

edes C. Estrada Doe v. Epstein Joint-privilege 02044 09/04/2009 Katherine W. Ezell Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Joint-privilege 02048 09/04/2009 Robert C. Josefsberg Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Joint-privilege 0

ot reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01930 09/05/2009 Bradley J. Edwards William J. Berger Client info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evide

issible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045-02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

m Horowitz Bradley J. Edwards Epstein Matter — Cross Notice of Alfredo Rodriguez Deposition Joint-privilege 02209-02210 07/01/2009 Bert Patton William J. Berger Epstein v. State of Florida — Emergency petition for Writ of Certiorari; Emergency motion to review denial of stay Joint-privilege 02215-02217

. Estrada Doe v. Epstein Joint-privilege 02044 09/04/2009 Katherine W. Ezell Bradley J. Edwards Doe v. Epstein — Joint-privilege e er r m Bob Critton 02048 09/04/2009 Robert C. Josefsberg Bradley J. Edwards Doe v. Epstein — Joint-privilege Letter from Bob Critton 02054 05/12/2009 Spence

ot reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01930 09/05/2009 Bradley J. Edwards William J. Berger Client info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evide

ble evidence; protected by privacy rights 02045.02046 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protect

dence, Incorporated. Would the attorneys please announce their appearances for the record. MR. WILLITS: Richard Willits, representing MR. BERGER: William J. Berger, representing M., M. and Jane Doc number two. MR. MERMELSTEIN: Stuart Mennetstein of Mermelstein and Horowitz. representing Jane Does numbers two

oe. 21 MR. LIINO: Adam Langino on behalf of 22 plaintiff, ■ 23 MS. EZELL: Cathy Ezell on behalf of Jane 24 Doe 101 and 102. 25 MR. CRITTON: Bob Critton on behalf of Page 13 1 Q. When was that? 2 A. I began on September of 2004. 3 Q. And where were you employed? 4 A. I work -- well, I have se