Epstein Secrets

m Horowitz Bradley J. Edwards Epstein Matter — Cross Notice of Alfredo Rodriguez Deposition Joint-privilege 02209-02210 07/01/2009 Bert Patton William J. Berger Epstein v. State of Florida — Emergency petition for Writ of Certiorari; Emergency motion to review denial of stay Joint-privilege 02215-02217

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876.06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

ot reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01930 09/05/2009 Bradley J. Edwards William J. Berger Client info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evide

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc

m Horowitz Bradley J. Edwards Epstein Matter — Cross Notice of Alfredo Rodriguez Deposition Joint-privilege 02209-02210 07/01/2009 Bert Patton William J. Berger Epstein v. State of Florida — Emergency petition for Writ of Certiorari; Emergency motion to review denial of stay Joint-privilege 02215-02217

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876-06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

ot reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01930 09/05/2009 Bradley J. Edwards William J. Berger Client info Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evide

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc

dence, Incorporated. Would the attorneys please announce their appearances for the record. MR. WILLITS: Richard Willits, representing MR. BERGER: William J. Berger, representing M., M. and Jane Doc number two. MR. MERMELSTEIN: Stuart Mennetstein of Mermelstein and Horowitz. representing Jane Does numbers two

44 22 one: 22 23 (Via tekpbone) 23 24 24 25 25 Page 6 Page 8 I Appearances contimied... 1 PROCEEDINGS 2 On behalf of the Plaintiff. Jane Doe II: 3 ISIDRO MANUEL GARCIA, ESQUIRE 2 — — — GARCIA EI.K1NS & BOEHRINGER 3 THE VIDEOGRAPHER: We are now on video 4 I record. This is Media No.

S MR HOROWITZ: Adam Horowitz, counsel for Plaintiff, Jane Doe 4. MR. CRITTON: Cindy, what tint is it? THE COURT REPORTER: It is 1.03. MR BERGER: William J. Berger for LM and EW. MR. HILL Jack Hill for CMA. MR LANGINO: Adam Langino from Leopold KUVill on behalf of BB. MR LUTHER: Mark Luttier on behalf of B

ontinue to attempt to control how discovery is conducted in this case and how this court has historically governed discovery. 9. Interestingly, in Jane Doe II, the state court case, attorney Sid Garcia took the deposition of the Defendant and his client, Jane Doe II, was present throughout the deposition.

ton, Esq., Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, Jane Kreusler-Walsh, Esq., Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq., Leopold-Kuvin, nd Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. and William J. Berger, Esq., Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, 4 day of July, 2009. 26 on this 10ffi EFTA00233638 CERTIFICATE OF TYPE, SIZE AND STYLE Counsel for Petition

EDWARDS: Brad Edwards, counsel for plaintiff Jane 8 Doe. 9 THE COURT: Good morning. 10 MR. GARCIA: Good morning, Your Honor. Sid Garcia for 11 Jane Doe II. 12 THE COURT: Good morning. 13 MR. WILLITS: Good morning, Your Honor. Richard 14 Willits, here on behalf of the plaintiff C.M.A.. 15 THE COUR