Epstein Secrets

in Joint-privilege 02290 09/18/2009 Bradley J. Edwards Spencer Kuvin Epstein Joint-privilege 02355.02356 06/10/2009 Mercedes C. Estrada Susan K. Stirling Hearing taken on 06/10/09 onmotion to unseal before Judge Colbath Joint-privilege 02362.02363 06/09/2009 Spencer Kuvin Katherine W. Ezell He

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876.06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01913-01914 06/15/2009 Susan K. Stirling Bradley J. Edwards Activity in case 9:08-cv-80893- KAM Doe v. Epstein Motion to Dismiss Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevan

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc

in Joint-privilege 02290 09/18/2009 Bradley J. Edwards Spencer Kuvin Epstein Joint-privilege 02355-02356 06/10/2009 Mercedes C. Estrada Susan K. Stirling Hearing taken on 06/10/09 onmotion to unseal before Judge Colbath Joint-privilege 02362-02363 06/09/2009 Spencer Kuvin Katherine W. Ezell He

/02/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Meeting w/Stanley Arkin Joint W/P Priv. 06861-06863 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06876-06879 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Stuart Mermelstein RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06891-06897 05/

irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 01913-01914 06/15/2009 Susan K. Stirling Bradley J. Edwards Activity in case 9:08-cv-80893- Doe v. Epstein Motion to Dismiss — Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02411-02413 05/12/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe II v. Epstein Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidenc