Epstein Secrets

vilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 03015 04/24/2009 Steven Jaffe Susan Stirling Litigation Strategy W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissi

97 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06901 09/11/2009 Bradley Edwards Mercedes Estrada Re:Jane Doe No. 101 & Jane Doe No. 102 vs. Epstein-Cross Notice Of Depos Joint W/P Priv. 06902 09/15/2009 Bradley Edwards Mercedes Estrada RE: Jane Doe N

reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 27155-27159 10/23/2009 Attorneys at RRA Steven Jaffe PACER entries Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evi

to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05541 07/31/2009 Carolyn Edwards Bradley Edwards All depos in Jane doe's case Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

vilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 03015 04/24/2009 Steven Jaffe Susan Stirling Litigation Strategy W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissi

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 01080-01081 06/22/2009 Robert C. Buschel Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe brother Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 01077 05/28/2009 Robert C. Buschel Bradley J. Edwards Doe family member Attorney/Client p

reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 27155-27159 10/23/2009 Attorneys at RRA Steven Jaffe PACER entries Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evi

to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05541 07/31/2O09 Carolyn Edwards Bradley Edwards All depos in jane doe's case Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

Deposition if a civil matter where he is a defendant. Prior to the onset of the deposition, Epstein was seated in an office along with Attorney's Steven Jaffe and Court Reporter i=ii=i Jeffrey Epstein, engaged the attorney's in an unsolicited conversation where he stated "I like your other two, I don't l

6:30 p.m. This would indicate that c ma e a specs trip ac - tot e office where the deposition was going on and for lack of better terms bumped into Joane Doe #3. This shows that his travels back to that location was intential and in conflict with his probation log. COUNT #6 • Florida State Licensed In