Epstein Secrets

the manner in which the cases were handled while Edwards was a partner at RRA: Q: The one meeting that you had in Mr., Mr. Rothstein's office with Russell Adler and some unknown person on the phone, were you given any direction at that time that certain discovery should be done or certain tactics should be

ter of these objections were speaking objections by Edwards's counsel that went beyond the scope of what is permitted in a deposition as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and relevant case law. As this analysis demonstrates, Edwards neither complied with the spirit of Rule 1.130(c) of the Florida Rules of

Mr. Berger, Mr. Adler, Mr. Edwards and other people associated with the firm like Mr. Fisten, Diane Villegas, if that's how you pronounce her name, Russell Adler, and many of the other partners of his firm currently under investigation by either the Florida or the U.S. Attorney or FBI or all of the above, si

king of Epstein's affidavit is warranted. Edwards does not contend that Epstein failed to comply with a court order as contemplated by Rule 1.380 of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure; nor does Edwards assert that Epstein's affidavit contains material that should be stricken from a pleading as delineated in Rule 1.140 o

the manner in which the cases were handled while Edwards was a partner at RRA: Q: The one meeting that you had in Mr., Mr. Rothstein's office with Russell Adler and some unknown person on the phone, were you given any direction at that time that certain discovery should be done or certain tactics should be

ter of these objections were speaking objections by Edwards's counsel that went beyond the scope of what is permitted in a deposition as provided in the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure and relevant case law. As this analysis demonstrates, Edwards neither complied with the spirit of Rule 1.130(c) of the Florida Rules of