Epstein Secrets

A00795602 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which had no bearing o

consent of Defendant Scott W. Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik, Esq., a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via email on Mr. Nurik, at [email protected]. This 3rd day of November, 2009. 'Si Fla LA M. Baia.i 9 COFFEY B URLINGTON OFFICE IN THE. GROVE, PENTHOUSE 2699 SOU I H

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on this 3rd day of November, 2009, with the agreement and consent of Defendant Scott W. Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik, Esq., a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via email on Mr. Nurik, at [email protected]. This 3rd day of November, 2009.

ony, many RRA attorneys conferred and were involved with the prosecution of the Epstein Actions, including as described below: a) On May 3, 2009, Russell Adler ("Adler"), a name partner in RRA, who took part with Edwards in the prosecution of the Epstein Actions, sent an email to the staff and attorneys in

assets to avoid paying any judgments that may be obtained by RRA clients against Epstein; g) On August 13, 2009 an email was sent from Rothstein to Mark Nurik ("Nurik"), an attorney at RRA, regarding legal research on causes of action against Epstein. On - 6 - FOWLER WHITE BURNETT P.A. • 901 PHILLIPS POI

ORIDA 33401 • (561) 802-9044 EFTA00584200 Epstein v Rothstein, Edwards Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Second Amended Complaint that same day, Nurik sent an email to Rothstein regarding discussions about Epstein. Also on August 13, 2009, Adler sent an email to Rothstein regarding legal research o

ony, many RRA attorneys conferred and were involved with the prosecution of the Epstein Actions, including as described below: a) On May 3, 2009, Russell Adler ("Adler"), a name partner in RRA, who took part with Edwards in the prosecution of the Epstein Actions, sent an email to the staff and attorneys in

assets to avoid paying any judgments that may be obtained by RRA clients against Epstein; g) On August 13, 2009 an email was sent from Rothstein to Mark Nurik ("Nurik"), an attorney at RRA, regarding legal research on causes of action against Epstein. On that same day, Nurik sent an email to Rothstein reg

as sent from Rothstein to Mark Nurik ("Nurik"), an attorney at RRA, regarding legal research on causes of action against Epstein. On that same day, Nurik sent an email to Rothstein regarding discussions about Epstein. Also on August 13, 2009, Adler sent an email to Rothstein regarding legal research o

liated with RRA, including without limitation, Mike Fisten, Ken Jenne, Wayne Black, Patrick Patrick Diaz, Rick Fandry, Cara Holmes, William Berger, Russell Adler and Mark Nurik, or any other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA

including without limitation, Mike Fisten, Ken Jenne, Wayne Black, Patrick Patrick Diaz, Rick Fandry, Cara Holmes, William Berger, Russell Adler and Mark Nurik, or any other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases agains

A00596503 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which had no bearing o

and consent of Defendant Scott W. Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik E a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via email on Mr. Nurik, at This 3rd day of November, 2009. s; S 9 COFFEY B URLINGTON OI+ICk IN THE DROVE. PENTHOUSE 2699 SOUTH SAYSHORE DRIVE MIAMI, FLORIDA 33 133

ith RRA, including without limitation, Mike Fisten, Ken Jenne, Wayne Black, Patrick Roberts, Patrick Diaz, Rick Fandry, Cara Holmes, William Berger, Russell Adler and Mark Nurik, or any other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA

without limitation, Mike Fisten, Ken Jenne, Wayne Black, Patrick Roberts, Patrick Diaz, Rick Fandry, Cara Holmes, William Berger, Russell Adler and Mark Nurik, or any other representatives of or persons purporting to be affiliated with RRA or representing themselves to have knowledge of RRA's cases agains

d all email communications by/between any attorney and/or employee of the former Rothstein law firm, including but not limited to, Scott Rothstein, Russell Adler, Williaria Berger, Michael Fisten, Ken Jenne, David Boden, Deborah Villegas, Andrew Barnett, Patrick Roberts, Richard Fandry, Christina Kittennan,

data, correspondence, and similar documents dated April 1, 2008 through August 1, 2010 by and between Bradley J. Edwards. Scott W. Rothstein, Marc, Nurik, Cara Holmes, Mike Fisten and any on of he following regarding or mentioning Jeffrey Epstein in any way: (a) the U.S. Attorney's Office, (b) the St

25 W FLAGLER STREET, STE 800 MIAMI, FL 33131 83. David Co field (David Seth Kokin) LAS VEGAS, NV 89135 84. 85 Michael Fisten Weston, FL 86 Russell Adler Delray Beach, FL 87. Marie Alessi BOYTON BEACH, FL 33472 88. Janusz Banasiak 358 EL BRILLO WAY PALM BEACH FL, 33480 89. Beata Banasiak 358

S. Ross, Gs q. 155. 156. Alfredo Rodriguez 11349 SW 86TH LN, Miami, FL C/O Federal Public Defender or Bureau of Prisons 157. Scott Rothstein do Mark Nurik One East Broward Boulevard, Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33301 EFTA00798057 2. Each contested factual issue expected to be addressed by th

re In this IS roughly 70-lawyer firm? 19 30 31 A I think there were about 10. Q And who were the other shareholders? A Stuart Rosenfeldt, Russell Adler, Lea 22 Streltfeld, Steve Lippman. There were others -- Mare 23 think might have been -- - pretty sure Hunk was a 24 shareholder. I just do

f them wore appealed. I wa➢ reversed a number of times. 23 0 Rough gue➢➢? 24 A I Couldn't tell you. I couldn't tell you how 2S many [limos. Nurik or Rothstein -- did they feel bullied or 2 threatened by Epstein lawyer➢? MR. SCAAOLA: Objection, predicate. 4 THE WITNESS: You are assuming tha

A00729418 Epstein v. RRA, et al. Page 16 investors or to prejudice Epstein's right to a fair trial in Palm Beach County. c) EDWARDS, Berger and Russell Adler (another named partner in RRA) all attended EPSTEIN's deposition. At that time, outrageous questions were asked of EPSTEIN which had no bearing o

d consent of Defendant Scott W. Rothstein's counsel, Mark Nurik Es , a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was served via email on Mr. Nurik, at This 3rd day of November, 2009. M.P ICSAM 9 COFFEY B 1./RLINGTON OFFICE IN THE GROVE, PENTHOUSE 2699 SOUTH BAYSHORE DRIVE MIAMI, FLORIDA