Epstein Secrets

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 25923 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Maribel Matiska legal opinion RE: Epstein W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidenc

97 05/12/2009 Bradley Edwards Katherine Ezell RE:Jane Doe II v. Epstein Joint W/P Priv. 06901 09/11/2009 Bradley Edwards Mercedes Estrada Re:Jane Doe No. 101 & Jane Doe No. 102 vs. Epstein-Cross Notice Of Depos Joint W/P Priv. 06902 09/15/2009 Bradley Edwards Mercedes Estrada RE: Jane Doe N

t reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05860-05861 09/10/2009 Bradley Edwards Maribel Matiska Litigation strategy Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead 135 EFTA00602969 Privilege Lo

to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05541 07/31/2009 Carolyn Edwards Bradley Edwards All depos in Jane doe's case Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr

vant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 25923 09/09/2009 Attorneys at. Maribel Matiska legal opinion RE: Epstein W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidenc

vilege;irrelevant & reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 01080-01081 06/22/2009 Jane Doe brother Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 01077 05/28/2009 1 1 3 Doe family member Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 25923 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Maribel Matiska legal opinion RE: Epstein W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidenc

ted to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence;protected by privacy rights 01080-01081 06/22/2009 Robert C. Buschel Bradley J. Edwards Jane Doe brother Attorney/Client privilege and/or work product 01077 05/28/2009 Robert C. Buschel Bradley J. Edwards Doe family member Attorney/Client p

t reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05860-05861 09/10/2009 Bradley Edwards Maribel Matiska Litigation strategy Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead 135 EFTA00310182 Privilege Lo

to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05541 07/31/2O09 Carolyn Edwards Bradley Edwards All depos in jane doe's case Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; pr