Epstein Secrets

participants who worked on the "Epstein Cases" while they were being prosecuted by RRA, her work on the "Epstein Cases" and the Ponzi scheme. 24. Maribel Matiska Address unknown at this time Mentioned in various RRA documents, including the privilege log filed in this case, she is expected to testify regard

lvd., Suite 400 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-4639 Depending on the testimony of witnesses and evidence presented by Edwards in his case in chief, Mr. Critton may be asked to testify as to the information about which he and his client, Jeffrey Epstein, were aware and upon which they relied in filing suit a

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 25923 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Maribel Matiska legal opinion RE: Epstein W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidenc

ed to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights O4207-04215 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell Letter to Critton RE: Protective Order W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pr

t reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05860-05861 09/10/2009 Bradley Edwards Maribel Matiska Litigation strategy Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead 135 EFTA00602969 Privilege Lo

Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards. Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 02331-02334 05/08/2009 Susan Stirling Bradley Edwards Critton order Transcript Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible e

vant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 25923 09/09/2009 Attorneys at. Maribel Matiska legal opinion RE: Epstein W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidenc

asonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights O4207-04215 09/04/2009 Attorneys at. Letter to Critton RE: Protective Order W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pr

t and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 25923 09/09/2009 Attorneys at RRA Maribel Matiska legal opinion RE: Epstein W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidenc

ed to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 04207-04215 09/04/2009 Attorneys at RRA Paul Cassell Letter to Critton RE: Protective W/P; Attorney Client Privilege; Irrelevant and Order not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence; pro

t reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 05860-05861 09/10/2009 Bradley Edwards Maribel Matiska Litigation strategy Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead 135 EFTA00310182 Privilege Lo

Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman BATES DATE TO FROM DESCRIPTION OBJECTION 02331-02334 05/08/2009 Susan Stirling Bradley Edwards Critton order Transcript Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible e