Epstein Secrets

N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Jane Kreusler-Walsh, Esq., 501 S. Flagler Drive, Suite 503, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5913; Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq., Leopold-Kuvin, P.A., 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410; and Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. and William J. Berger, Esq.,

503, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5913; Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq., Leopold-Kuvin, P.A., 2925 PGA Boulevard,

e of the Non-prosecution Agreement or Its Addendum. 13 1. Petitioner Cannot Identify a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA. 19 3. Federal Rule of Criminal Proced

uther & Coleman, 515 N. Flagler Drive, Suite 400, West Palm Beach, FL 33401; Esq., 501 S. Flagler Drive, Suite 503, West Palm Beach, FL 33401-5913; Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq., Leopold-Kuvin, P.A., 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200, Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410; and Bradley 3. Edwards, Esq. and William J. Berger, Esq.,

Beach, Fl 33401-5913 Deanna K. Shullman 400 North Drive, Suite 1100 P.O. Box 2602 Tampa, Fl 33602 2 EFTA00184018 Spencer T. Kuvin Leopold- Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 Robert D. Critton of Burma; Critton, Luttier & Coleman 515 North Flagler Drive,

sure of the Non-prosecution Agreement or Its Addendum 13 1. Petitioner Cannot Identify a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA. 19 3. Federal Rule of Criminal Proced

dberger & Weiss, P.A. (counsel for petitioner) Jane Kreusler-Walsh of Kreusler-Walsh, Compiani & Vargas, P.A. (appellate counsel for petitioner) Spencer T. Kuvin of Leopold-Kuvin, P.A. (counsel for non-party intervener, B.B.) Honorable Kenneth A. Marra (judge, Southern District of Florida) Palm Beach News

AY AND SUPPORTING MEMORANDUM OF LAW. FILED BY S. KUVIN, ESQ [72 ODMO - ORDER DENYING MOTION Filing Da

sure of the Non-prosecution Agreement or Its Addendum. 13 1. Petitioner Cannot Identify a Rule 2.420(cX9) Interest that Warrants Closure. 16 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Fla. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA. 19 3. Federal Rule of Criminal Proced

ack Alan Goldberger, Esq., Atterbury Goldberger, et al.,■ Robert D. Critton, Esq., Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman, Jane Kreusler-Walsh, Esq., Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq., Leopold-Kuvin, nd Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. and William J. Berger, Esq., Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, 4 day of July, 2009. 26 on this 10ff

ane Kreusler-Walsh Terannlar Walak rni-nninn; P, Von-Ten. 13 A. Deanna K. Shullman AAA A uite 1100 2 EFTA00233665 Spencer T. Kuvin Leopold- Kuvin, P.A. nnnc Tlf, n 1r) na^ Robert D. Critton of Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman Jack A. Goldberger ot Atterburv, Goldberger. & Weiss, P.A.

ith be argued that the trial court departed from the essential requirements of law in determining that no such privacy interest was implicated. 2. The Federal Court's Decisions in Case No. 08-80736 (S.D. Ha. 2008) Did Not Preclude the Lower Court's Orders Unsealing the NPA.1° Nor did the trial court's rejection o