Epstein Secrets

JKW/bl Enclosure cc/enc. Robert D. Critton Jack A. Goldberger Jeffrey H. Sloman Judith Stevenson Arco William J. Berger Deanna K. Shullman Spencer T. Kuvin EFTA00180621 JUN-26-2003 FRI 02:28 PM FAX NO. 5618358691 P. 01 Date: 6/26/09 ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. ATTORNEY AT LAW SUITE 1400

William J. Berger Deanna K. Shullman Spencer T. Kuvin EFTA00180621 JUN-26-2003 FRI 02:28 PM FAX NO.

l legislation, courts should interpret it "liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and Intent." Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership v. BP America Production Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1118 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting remedial legislation should be "interpreted liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and i

VER SHEET To: R. Alexander Acosta, Esq. USAO Barbara Burns, Esq. ASAO Bradley J. Edwards, Fsq. William J. Berger, Esq. Robert D. Critton, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Subject: State of Florida v. Epstein Pages: 3 , including this cover sheet. See attached letter. ORIGINAL WILL BE SENT: YES X NO IF THE

Berger, Esq. Robert D. Critton, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Subject: State of Florida v. Epstein Page

l legislation, courts should interpret it "liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent." Elliott Industries Ltd. Partnership v. BP America Production Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1118 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting remedial legislation should be "interpreted liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and i

VER SHEET To: R. Alexander Acosta, Esq. USAO Barbara Burns, Esq. ASAO Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. William J. Berger, Esq. Robert D. Critton. Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Subject: State of Florida v. Epstein Pages: 3 , including this cover sheet. See attached letter. ORIGINAL WILL BE SENT: YES X NO IF TH

Berger, Esq. Robert D. Critton. Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Subject: State of Florida v. Epstein Page

l legislation, courts should interpret it "liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and intent." Elliott Industries Lid. Partnership v. BP America Production Co., 407 F.3d 1091, 1118 (10th Cir. 2005) (noting remedial legislation should be "interpreted liberally to facilitate and accomplish its purposes and i