Epstein Secrets

West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-202-6360 Fax: 561-828-0983 [email protected] Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Leopold-Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 561-684-6500 Fax: 561-515-2610 Counsel for Plaintiff in Relate

rah Kellen Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Leopold-Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Blvd., Suite

15889 (S.D. Fla. 2004) allows for the discovery sought in Sections II. a-g above and in Defendant's Motion to Identify. See also Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 26; Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978); Dunbar v. U.S., 502 F.2d 206 (5th Cir. 1974); Rossbach v. Rundle, 128 F.Supp.2d 1348, 1354 (S.D. Fla. 200); F

a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this £ day of December, 2009: Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Fax: Counsel for Plaintiff'''. Jack Goldberger, Esq. ss, P.A. Fax: Co-counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00723231 v. Epstein Ca

's deposition was set for September 2, 2009, and Mr. Epstein was in attendance for said deposition. Directly after asking Mr. Epstein his name, Mr. Kuvin then asked Mr. Epstein, "[ijs it true, sir, that you have what's been described as an egg-shaped penis." Accordingly, Mr. Kuvin immediately set the

to encompass any matter that bears on, or that reasonably could lead to another matter that could bear on any issue that is or may be in the case." Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978). Discovery is not limited to the issues raised by the pleadings because 'discovery itself is designed to help

SP= 18 EFTA00725758 Counsel for Plaintiff, C.M.A. Bruce Reinhart, Esq. Bruce E. Reinhart P.A. Counsel for Defendan Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Fax: Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. Counsel for Pk:nags in Related Cases Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.

r Defendan Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Fax: Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Cas

315889 (S.D. Ha. 2004) allows for the discovery sought in Sections II. a-g above and in Defendant's Motion to Identify. See also Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 26; Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978); Dunbar v. U.S., 502 F.2d 206 (516 Cir. 1974); Rossbach v. Rundle 128 F.Supp.2d 1348, 1354 (S.D. Fla. 200); Fe