Epstein Secrets

West Palm Beach, FL 33401 561-202-6360 Fax: 561-828-0983 [email protected] Counsel for Defendant Sarah Kellen Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Leopold-Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Blvd., Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 561-684-6500 Fax: 561-515-2610 Counsel for Plaintiff in Relate

rah Kellen Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Leopold-Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Blvd., Suite

to Identify. See also Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 26; Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978); Dunbar v. U.S., 502 F.2d 206 (5th Cir. 1974); Rossbach v. Rundle, 128 F.Supp.2d 1348, 1354 (S.D. Fla. 200); Fed.R.Civ.Pro 33(b)(4)(Plaintiffs must show that the requests are unreasonable or burdensome,

a true copy of the foregoing was sent by fax and U.S. Mail to the following addressees on this £ day of December, 2009: Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Fax: Counsel for Plaintiff'''. Jack Goldberger, Esq. ss, P.A. Fax: Co-counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein EFTA00723231 v. Epstein Ca

's deposition was set for September 2, 2009, and Mr. Epstein was in attendance for said deposition. Directly after asking Mr. Epstein his name, Mr. Kuvin then asked Mr. Epstein, "[ijs it true, sir, that you have what's been described as an egg-shaped penis." Accordingly, Mr. Kuvin immediately set the

outweighs the likely benefit. Id. The party resisting discovery has a heavy burden of showing why the requested discovery should not be permitted. Rossbach v. Rundle, 128 F.Supp.2d 1348, 1354 (S.D. Fla. 2000) ("The onus is on the party resisting discovery to demonstrate specifically how the objected-to

SP= 18 EFTA00725758 Counsel for Plaintiff, C.M.A. Bruce Reinhart, Esq. Bruce E. Reinhart P.A. Counsel for Defendan Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Fax: Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. Counsel for Pk:nags in Related Cases Nos. 09-80591 and 09-80656 Jack Alan Goldberger, Esq.

r Defendan Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Fax: Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Cas

to Identify. See also Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 26; Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. Sanders, 437 U.S. 340, 352 (1978); Dunbar v. U.S., 502 F.2d 206 (516 Cir. 1974); Rossbach v. Rundle 128 F.Supp.2d 1348, 1354 (S.D. Fla. 200); Fed.R.Civ.Pro 33(b)(4)(Plaintiffs must show that the requests are unreasonable or burdensome, w