Epstein Secrets

as made available for her deposition, which she was in April, 2010. See Affidavit of Michael J. Pike attached as Exhibit F and 10/13/09 E-mail from Spencer Kuvin attached as Exhibit G. While counsel for Jane Doe did not confirm this agreement in writing, he represented same in the aforementioned telephone co

hed as Exhibit F and 10/13/09 E-mail from Spencer Kuvin attached as Exhibit G. While counsel for Jane Do

r conversations with hei· supervising partner as the questions invaded the attorney-client privilege). 14. Regarding the scope of discovery, Judge Linnea Johnson noted in her October 28, 2009 Omnibus Order (DE #377), "[w]hile the scope of discovery is broad, it is not without limits. Washington v. Brown & Wi

as made available for her deposition, which she was in April, 2010. See Affidavit of Michael J. Pike attached as Exhibit F and 10/13/09 E-mail from Spencer Kuvin attached as Exhibit G. While counsel for Jane Doe did not confirm this agreement in writing, he represented same in the aforementioned telephone co

hed as Exhibit F and 10/13/09 E-mail from Spencer Kuvin attached as Exhibit G. While counsel for Jane Do

er conversations with her supervising partner as the questions invaded the attorney-client privilege). 14. Regarding the scope of discovery, Judge Linnea Johnson noted in her October 28, 2009 Omnibus Order (DE #377), "[w]hile the scope of discovery is broad, it is not without limits. Washington v. & William

2009 Page 5 of 26 561 -202-6360 Fax: 561-828-0983 ~brucereinhartlaw.com Counsel/or Defendant Sarah Kellen Theodore J. Leopold, Esq. Spencer T, Kuvin, Esq, Leopold, Kuvin, P.A. 2925 PGA Blvd,, Suite 200 Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410 561-684-6500 Fax: 561-515-2610 sk\,[email protected] Cou

d beyond September of 2005. Therefore whatever information Mr. Zinoview may have, postdates that time. 5. Regarding the scope of discovery, Judge Linnea Johnson noted in her October 28, 2009 Omnibus Order (DE #377), "[w]hile the scope of discovery is broad, it is not without limits. Washington v. Brown & Wi