Epstein Secrets

JKW/bl Enclosure cc/enc. Robert D. Critton Jack A. Goldberger Jeffrey H. Sloman Judith Stevenson Arco William J. Berger Deanna K. Shullman Spencer T. Kuvin EFTA00180621 JUN-26-2003 FRI 02:28 PM FAX NO. 5618358691 P. 01 Date: 6/26/09 ATTERBURY, GOLDBERGER & WEISS, P.A. ATTORNEY AT LAW SUITE 1400

William J. Berger Deanna K. Shullman Spencer T. Kuvin EFTA00180621 JUN-26-2003 FRI 02:28 PM FAX NO.

een but not heard. The Crime Victims' Rights Act sought to change this by making victims independent participants in the criminal justice process." Kenna v. U.S. Dist. Court for C.D. Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1013 (9th Clr. 2006). Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpr

VER SHEET To: R. Alexander Acosta, Esq. USAO Barbara Burns, Esq. ASAO Bradley J. Edwards, Fsq. William J. Berger, Esq. Robert D. Critton, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Subject: State of Florida v. Epstein Pages: 3 , including this cover sheet. See attached letter. ORIGINAL WILL BE SENT: YES X NO IF THE

Berger, Esq. Robert D. Critton, Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Subject: State of Florida v. Epstein Page

een but not heard. The Crime Victims' Rights Act sought to change this by making victims independent participants in the criminal justice process." Kenna v. U.S. Dist. Court for C.D. Cat, 435 F.3d 1011, 1013 (9th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpre

VER SHEET To: R. Alexander Acosta, Esq. USAO Barbara Burns, Esq. ASAO Bradley J. Edwards, Esq. William J. Berger, Esq. Robert D. Critton. Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Subject: State of Florida v. Epstein Pages: 3 , including this cover sheet. See attached letter. ORIGINAL WILL BE SENT: YES X NO IF TH

Berger, Esq. Robert D. Critton. Esq. Spencer T. Kuvin, Esq. Subject: State of Florida v. Epstein Page

een but not heard. The Crime Victims' Rights Act sought to change this by making victims independent participants in the criminal justice process." Kenna v. U.S. Dist. Court for CD. Cal., 435 F.3d 1011, 1013 (9th Cir. 2006). Accordingly, because the CVRA is remedial legislation, courts should interpre